All Forum Comments
Comment by Backhouse posted on Spotmatic F with 35mm and 50mm lenses at 10/11/2010 - 12:30

http://picasaweb.google.com/Backhouse78/PentaxFilmStuff#5534284237653639282

http://picasaweb.google.com/Backhouse78/PentaxFilmStuff#5534365018342447234
I think you can download the full res versions from the picasaweb links below the piccies.
Comment by Backhouse posted on What scanner? at 09/11/2010 - 23:38
Comment by Backhouse posted on What scanner? at 09/11/2010 - 23:03
Its funny the prints I did (optical enlargements) have much more punch and contrast, I'll bung one under the flatbed scanner at work tomorrow and see if I can post it up.
Andrew, buy a spotty and some film, they are great fun to use, I've seen developing tanks go for under a fiver on ebay and chemicals are not expensive, my enlarger was given to me from another forum and I had offers of others from other members, plenty of free and seriously cheap film stuff out there.
Comment by Backhouse posted on Cars and stuff on Adox CHS100-ART at 09/11/2010 - 23:00


Yep, still using film, I bought into the digital thing (could never afford to process enough as a kid to get the hang of it) to rattle off a lot of pics and learn, then found my machinegunning technique left me with a LOT of pics to PP, so I bought a Pentax Spotmatic F to slow me down a bit. then an ESII (the lovely spot is in the classifieds if anyone wants a clean reliable 35mm) because it looked cool and I found the spot very tricky for low light stuff. I'm now amassing a range of nice lenses for it SMC 28,35,50,105,135,200mm so far!
The Adox is not bad, its cheap enough for certain, very succeptable to fogging, I loaded it on the spiral just in the darkroom, no changin bag and I have the tinyest light leak around the door, this was enough to fog the centre of the film while loading, but not that much. it develops very nicely though, I will probably use it again (well I have a roll of iso25 in the camera now), supposed to be a very soft/delicate emulsion but I managed not to damage it and its only the second film I've dev'd.
But yet I have set myself up to develop enlarge/print and scan myself, the whole lot has cost me less than £100 including a minolta proper 35mm slide/neg scanner, which those top ones are straight out of the scanner.
Comment by Backhouse posted on Cars and stuff on Adox CHS100-ART at 09/11/2010 - 21:24
will consider offers
Comment by Backhouse posted on Spotmatic F with 35mm and 50mm lenses at 09/11/2010 - 01:14
Macro done with a pair of SMC 50mm f1.4 back to back.
[IMG]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_koPfVxOThxg/TNiYEUhIuPI/AAAAAAAAAeA/S1UyNUd6Q5I/s512/Rolex%20in%20motion.jpg[/IMG]
Friends Honda CRX

A silly big turbo almost in a scooby

Some random Mugenness (make more sense to Honda owners)

Funky little DelSol

Comment by Backhouse posted on Cars and stuff on Adox CHS100-ART at 09/11/2010 - 01:10
Tidy SpotF body in full working order, couple of dust specs in the view finder, some rub marks on the corners and a dent to the base shown in the second pic, still a very clean and tidy camera, light seals are good and light meter works etc comes with the case and manual as shown £35
Super Takumar 35mm f3.5 lens, snappy iris, clean optics and cosmetically very good. £35
SMC Takumar 50mm F1.4 lens, snappy iris and clean optics cosmetically very good, with hama skylight filter. £70
Would rather sell as a bundle but may split.
[IMG]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_koPfVxOThxg/TNV0e_rdAOI/AAAAAAAAAdo/MzkdwOGnJW8/s720/spotf%20for%20sale.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_koPfVxOThxg/TNV0fDDitdI/AAAAAAAAAds/M608cRLDWQI/s720/spotf%20dent%20for%20sale.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Backhouse posted on Spotmatic F with 35mm and 50mm lenses at 06/11/2010 - 15:50
I have a roll of HP5+ which I will hopefully get developed today.
Comment by Backhouse posted on Bought a 'new' scanner :) at 03/11/2010 - 12:20
I like the results you've got from the BW400C. I tried the Fuji equivalent recently and was pretty disappointed with how they turned out - very gritty and poor contrast. Might have to give that Kodak a spin instead.
The scanner looks to have done a very good job too. I'd like a dedicated film scanner but most of the film I shoot is 120 and dedicated MF scanners cost £££'s so I'll stick to my flatbed until my Lotto numbers come up...
Which lens(es) were these btw?
Bought a 'new' scanner, old Minolta Dimage Scan Dual, seems to be doing an admirable job for its age, older negs don't half attract dust mind!
I like the results you've got from the BW400CN. I tried the Fuji equivalent recently and was pretty disappointed with how they turned out - very gritty and poor contrast. Might have to give that Kodak a spin instead. ...
Sadly, Kodak have discontinued this film in medium format. I got the last roll at Adorama and 7dayshop couldn't get me any.
K.
Comment by Backhouse posted on Bought a 'new' scanner :) at 03/11/2010 - 11:04

