Bought a 'new' scanner :)

Backhouse
Posted 03/11/2010 - 09:37 Link
Bought a 'new' scanner, old Minolta Dimage Scan Dual, seems to be doing an admirable job for its age, older negs don't half attract dust mind!

Trip into town with the ESII Fuji Superia 200 from memory.

Wakey wakey
Comment Image


Down by the Wey side
Comment Image


I wouldn't like to be hanging off it!
Comment Image


Couple from earlier, kodak BW400C in my Spot F

The cathedral
Comment Image


old meter from work
Comment Image
hefty1
Posted 03/11/2010 - 10:13 Link
I like the results you've got from the BW400C. I tried the Fuji equivalent recently and was pretty disappointed with how they turned out - very gritty and poor contrast. Might have to give that Kodak a spin instead.

The scanner looks to have done a very good job too. I'd like a dedicated film scanner but most of the film I shoot is 120 and dedicated MF scanners cost £££'s so I'll stick to my flatbed until my Lotto numbers come up...

Which lens(es) were these btw?
Joining the Q
womble
Posted 03/11/2010 - 10:36 Link
Backhouse wrote:
Bought a 'new' scanner, old Minolta Dimage Scan Dual, seems to be doing an admirable job for its age, older negs don't half attract dust mind!
Get yourself some PEC fluid and pads. It is costly but goes a very long way and well worth the time saved dust-spotting images.

hefty1 wrote:
I like the results you've got from the BW400CN. I tried the Fuji equivalent recently and was pretty disappointed with how they turned out - very gritty and poor contrast. Might have to give that Kodak a spin instead. ...
I really like the Kodak film although it pays to "over expose" it a little. I usually set my ASA dial to 320...

Sadly, Kodak have discontinued this film in medium format. I got the last roll at Adorama and 7dayshop couldn't get me any.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Backhouse
Posted 03/11/2010 - 11:04 Link
hefty1 wrote:
I like the results you've got from the BW400C. I tried the Fuji equivalent recently and was pretty disappointed with how they turned out - very gritty and poor contrast. Might have to give that Kodak a spin instead.

The scanner looks to have done a very good job too. I'd like a dedicated film scanner but most of the film I shoot is 120 and dedicated MF scanners cost £££'s so I'll stick to my flatbed until my Lotto numbers come up...

Which lens(es) were these btw?
I'm guessing but the colour pics could be the SMC 50mm f1.4 and I think the B&W super tak 35mm f3.5.


womble wrote:
Backhouse wrote:
Bought a 'new' scanner, old Minolta Dimage Scan Dual, seems to be doing an admirable job for its age, older negs don't half attract dust mind!
Get yourself some PEC fluid and pads. It is costly but goes a very long way and well worth the time saved dust-spotting images.

hefty1 wrote:
I like the results you've got from the BW400CN. I tried the Fuji equivalent recently and was pretty disappointed with how they turned out - very gritty and poor contrast. Might have to give that Kodak a spin instead. ...
I really like the Kodak film although it pays to "over expose" it a little. I usually set my ASA dial to 320...

Sadly, Kodak have discontinued this film in medium format. I got the last roll at Adorama and 7dayshop couldn't get me any.

K.
Will give the pec fluid a go, should be good for sensor cleaning on my canon too, this was my first play with the new scanner so I just wanted to see some pics I think the two B&W were erring on the side of overexposure with the needle, it was my first film shooting in a LONG time.
Edited by Backhouse: 03/11/2010 - 11:04
hefty1
Posted 03/11/2010 - 11:20 Link
womble wrote:
Sadly, Kodak have discontinued this film in medium format. I got the last roll at Adorama and 7dayshop couldn't get me any.
Boooooooo!!! Guess I'll have to persevere with the Fuji then

Backhouse wrote:
I'm guessing but the colour pics could be the SMC 50mm f1.4 and I think the B&W super tak 35mm f3.5.
I don't think I've ever seen a bad picture taken with the 35/3.5 - much nicer than the 35/2 Super Tak I had until recently.
Joining the Q
womble
Posted 03/11/2010 - 11:41 Link
hefty1 wrote:
womble wrote:
Sadly, Kodak have discontinued this film in medium format. I got the last roll at Adorama and 7dayshop couldn't get me any.
Boooooooo!!! Guess I'll have to persevere with the Fuji then
What about Iford XP2? I prefer the Kodak as it is cheaper (in 35mm) K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
hefty1
Posted 03/11/2010 - 11:43 Link
I didn't think you could get XP2 in 120? Might have a go with that then
Joining the Q
womble
Posted 03/11/2010 - 11:47 Link
hefty1 wrote:
I didn't think you could get XP2 in 120? Might have a go with that then
According to the Ilford web site it does. I have never tried the 120 roll film version myself.

K.

Edit: Silverprint stock it.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Edited by womble: 03/11/2010 - 11:49
Backhouse
Posted 03/11/2010 - 12:20 Link
I've got a couple of rolls of the ADOX CHS (25 and 100) to play with, I'll let you know how they go, but they are supposed to be VERY fine grain. They are available in 120 format and not too expensive.

I have a roll of HP5+ which I will hopefully get developed today.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo