All Forum Comments
Hopefully they put in the effort from the NEC into Photokina this year.
Comment by Anvh posted on Focus on Imaging Show 2010 - NEC Birmingham at 04/03/2010 - 22:21
Thank you Ems, this indeed makes you photo come out more from my point of view don't know what others think about it
Comment by Anvh posted on Hard drive at 04/03/2010 - 21:38
Ems, these are lovely shots. You should put a frame around them so that you can look at them a bit more easily. The grey of the forum and the text around it doesn't do it justice
I wonder how the first photo will look if you soften the image a bit.
I wonder how the first photo will look if you soften the image a bit.
Comment by Anvh posted on Hard drive at 04/03/2010 - 21:23
For the watermarking link
Comment by Anvh posted on Need a little help with CS2 at 04/03/2010 - 20:30
Let them first bring the thing out, how long has it been now, almost 4 years if not longer, might be the longest developed camera in the world
Comment by Anvh posted on 645D aimed for Spring 2010 at 04/03/2010 - 20:10
Stunning photo.
You might as well just by a telescope
You might as well just by a telescope
Comment by Anvh posted on New Moon with 1000mm Lens at 04/03/2010 - 20:05
bwichmawr wrote:
Oh yes, it is a bit blue. You can sort it out in Photoshop, I expect.
Indeed, you can just use the white clouds to set the correct white balance it becomes slightly less blue then.Oh yes, it is a bit blue. You can sort it out in Photoshop, I expect.
Comment by Anvh posted on Blue tinge? at 04/03/2010 - 20:04
Thank you Pauly.
Well I'm going to get them printed on A3 size any idea what kind of framing should fit the photo?
Well I'm going to get them printed on A3 size any idea what kind of framing should fit the photo?
Comment by Anvh posted on Glass Flower at 04/03/2010 - 20:01
Shaky wrote:
As for the K20, alas it was evidently unable to muster a share of the market greater than 1%.
yes I thought that too but the whole market share of Pentax is 1.6% and the market share of the K200D is also 1.6% ... how many precent does that leave for the K20D?As for the K20, alas it was evidently unable to muster a share of the market greater than 1%.
MostlyHarmless wrote:
Kubrick's f0.7 was used on a 'non-reflexed' camera, so presumably did not have any mirror/retrofocus issues either (pictures of Mitchell BNC cameras show a separate finder). I seem to remember from Nikon MF days that some lenses (fisheyes I think though - like this) would only work with the mirror locked up, and a supplementary finder - so once again the need not be retrofocus.
yes you're right about that, also the register distance is much shorter because there is no mirror.thoughton wrote:
Stefan I can't remember much about the details, but I'm sure there was a Nikkor 58mm f1, and a Nikkor 85mm f1.
Also don't forget Stanley Kubrick's Zeiss 50mm f/0.7 lens.
There was certainly a Nikkor 85mm f1 (and a 75mm one too 5 think) but I'm 90% sure they're not F-mount - '53mm mount' and the adaptor next to it in the picture are a clue - so no need to be retrofocus designs?Stefan I can't remember much about the details, but I'm sure there was a Nikkor 58mm f1, and a Nikkor 85mm f1.
Also don't forget Stanley Kubrick's Zeiss 50mm f/0.7 lens.
Kubrick's f0.7 was used on a 'non-reflexed' camera, so presumably did not have any mirror/retrofocus issues either (pictures of Mitchell BNC cameras show a separate finder). I seem to remember from Nikon MF days that some lenses (fisheyes I think though - like this) would only work with the mirror locked up, and a supplementary finder - so once again the need not be retrofocus.
So for example the camera the Zeis was mounted on had a register of 4mm if that had a 45mm Diamter mount just like Pentax you can get f/0.09 lens
Theoretical of course.
About the Repro Nikkon 85mm f/1 that's a macro lens and that's the exception to the rule but the effective f-number is only f/2
link
Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax K-5? at 04/03/2010 - 19:59
iceblinker wrote:
I don't know, I haven't tested it. It depends how quickly it does the NR.
How quick it does the NR isn't important right if it first upload the image in the buffer the sensor is ready to make the other photo, so it shouldn't have an impact on shooting speed but I can just as easily be wrong though. I don't know, I haven't tested it. It depends how quickly it does the NR.
Comment by Anvh posted on K7 FPS and in-camera noise reduction at 04/03/2010 - 19:45
