Glass Flower
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:17
Link
An different question, is this a photograph or not?
And why so?
And why so?
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:22
Link
I cannot answer either of your questions but I like it, a great deal. I don't really think the argument of "graphic art" v. "photography" matters really. Would I be happy with this on my wall? Yes! Job done...
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:26
Link
Oh Stefan...that colour and the black background and beautifully bevelled frame...did I even notice the blown highlights?
Regards,
Andrew
Regards,
Andrew
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:31
Link
Thank you Kris.
I'm indeed also tempted to print it out and see how it would look on paper but the amount of inkt there might go into
About the "graphic art" vs "photography" came to me because in the last few months my view on what's a photograph or not has broaden a lot. I was one of the purists when I began but now I just throw in any effect or what not to make it different, I would not have called this a photograph but I do now.
I'm indeed also tempted to print it out and see how it would look on paper but the amount of inkt there might go into
About the "graphic art" vs "photography" came to me because in the last few months my view on what's a photograph or not has broaden a lot. I was one of the purists when I began but now I just throw in any effect or what not to make it different, I would not have called this a photograph but I do now.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:34
Link
Can you let us know how you made the graduated border? I like it a great deal in this shot.
Thanks, Kris.
Thanks, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:36
Link
bwichmawr wrote:
Oh Stefan...that colour and the black background and beautifully bevelled frame...did I even notice the blown highlights?
Regards,
Andrew
Thank you Andrew, not bad for an accident Oh Stefan...that colour and the black background and beautifully bevelled frame...did I even notice the blown highlights?
Regards,
Andrew
The blue was also accidental because I was trying to recover the highlights and I inverse some layers (i Believe this image counts 12 layers in total) and it became blue and I loved it.
And the framing, I took that from someone else so feel free to copy it from me.
If you've photoshop I can explain it to you how to do it.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:37
Link
CS3 here!
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:41
Link
Stefan, stuff the blown highlights. This is a great image, no matter whether it is a photo or other image.
I have tried, though, to make the highlights a bit less dominating. I don't think it improves the image much, though...
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/Pentax%20user/_IGP6046-Edit2.jpg[/IMG]
Prieni
I have tried, though, to make the highlights a bit less dominating. I don't think it improves the image much, though...
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/Pentax%20user/_IGP6046-Edit2.jpg[/IMG]
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:49
Link
I've done it in photoshop and it's really simple really.
There is one thing you need and that's 2 or more layers.
If you're done with your photo you enlarge the canvas to create the border, do that to your own judgement. If everything is alight it will enlarge the canvas but not the photo so you get an border.
Then select the top layer of the photo and go into the layer option (double click), and the option you want to check on is "Outer Glow", I think that one is self explaining what it does.
In that option you can select the colour, how big and how the steep the transition must be and more things, just have a play with things.
The best effects are created with a gradient from a colour to transparent and the background colour is simply a "fill" in the extra created pixels when you enlarge the canvas.
So Basicly
- Enlarge canvas creates the broader
- layer above that with an "outer glow" from the layer options, creates the glow which is blue in my photo.
Is this understandable or do you want some pictures?
ps. this can also be done with other pixel editing programs most likely so give it a try.
There is one thing you need and that's 2 or more layers.
If you're done with your photo you enlarge the canvas to create the border, do that to your own judgement. If everything is alight it will enlarge the canvas but not the photo so you get an border.
Then select the top layer of the photo and go into the layer option (double click), and the option you want to check on is "Outer Glow", I think that one is self explaining what it does.
In that option you can select the colour, how big and how the steep the transition must be and more things, just have a play with things.
The best effects are created with a gradient from a colour to transparent and the background colour is simply a "fill" in the extra created pixels when you enlarge the canvas.
So Basicly
- Enlarge canvas creates the broader
- layer above that with an "outer glow" from the layer options, creates the glow which is blue in my photo.
Is this understandable or do you want some pictures?
ps. this can also be done with other pixel editing programs most likely so give it a try.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:52
Link
Prieni wrote:
Stefan, stuff the blown highlights. This is a great image, no matter whether it is a photo or other image.
I have tried, though, to make the highlights a bit less dominating. I don't think it improves the image much, though...
Thank you Preini, I had the same problem, you will lose the 3D, but your attempt is better then that from mine. Stefan, stuff the blown highlights. This is a great image, no matter whether it is a photo or other image.
I have tried, though, to make the highlights a bit less dominating. I don't think it improves the image much, though...
I will just have to live with it.
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:54
Link
This is a seriously beautiful image, well done. I guess the highlights are blown due to too much contrast boost? They don't look blown in the original, so maybe just keep an eye on the histogram in Photoshop when tweaking
Matt
GX20; DA 17-70 F4; 18-55 kit; Ricoh 50mm F2; Vivitar 75-205mm F3.8
GX20; DA 17-70 F4; 18-55 kit; Ricoh 50mm F2; Vivitar 75-205mm F3.8
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:54
Link
I think I prefer it with the highlights. It is eye catching
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 03/03/2010 - 19:57
Link
bforbes wrote:
I think I prefer it with the highlights. It is eye catching
Yes, they do work don't they. Possibly because the image is black & white and blue only.
I think I prefer it with the highlights. It is eye catching
Matt
GX20; DA 17-70 F4; 18-55 kit; Ricoh 50mm F2; Vivitar 75-205mm F3.8
GX20; DA 17-70 F4; 18-55 kit; Ricoh 50mm F2; Vivitar 75-205mm F3.8
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



10412 posts
17 years
Dordrecht,
the Netherlands
Please click on it since this little size deforms the effect.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/_IGP6046-Edit.jpg[/IMG]
Well I quite like it, it's just the blown highlights I'm not happy with, does anyone have an idea how to reduce that?
Any other suggestions and tips or questions are also welcome
ps. here is the original link
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ