Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
No it doesn't I-berg but still thanks, I was hoping you could set the aperture on a set value in manual mode so that it would bracket with shutter-speed only, I was pretty sure you could do that somehow...

Comment by Anvh posted on K10D Bracketing in manual at 21/04/2010 - 00:03

Anvh
I bought a Westcott Apollo softbox so will let you know what I find.

I at least bought it over the Creative light system because of money, more even light and probably it will be more light efficient.

Comment by Anvh posted on begginers flash umbrella & stand at 20/04/2010 - 23:13

Anvh
Doug, sorry

It was a reaction of the two above that comment HG and Matt, they are talking that you can do a lot with photoshop to save a photo but it's very limited and my humble opinion is that photo-shopping can add flair to your photo and is not something you should ignore.
How many great fine art photographers didn't work on their photos in the darkroom, I think your list will be quite short.

Comment by Anvh posted on Fed up!! at 20/04/2010 - 23:11

Anvh
Aren't we going down the wrong route...?
Photoshop has little to do with making sharp photos in my humble opinion, there is only so much you can rescue from a bad photo.

This photo is a heavily photo-shopped photo but does not fit in your description at all. link
Neither does this one with a lens flare link

Comment by Anvh posted on Fed up!! at 20/04/2010 - 22:44

Anvh
Made some photos today and wanted to bracket them but I notice also the aperture change and I thought I had locked that somehow once... I can't find it in the manual so fast.
Can any one help me?

I know you can use Av and did used that but I want to use M so comments that I should use Av won't be excepted

Comment by Anvh posted on K10D Bracketing in manual at 20/04/2010 - 22:15

Anvh
Ron you should take a look at a Canon forum or be on flickr, I think you would see the PUF isn't that bad

Comment by Anvh posted on Fed up!! at 20/04/2010 - 22:09

Anvh
Someone is selling his DA*16-50 and DA*50-135 here but I would haggle some of the price to make it intersting. link

Spacus wrote:
I am definately getting rid of the tamron 70-300mm and one of the 18-55's and maybe the sigma 28-80 if a am recommended a good lens.
Sounds like a good plan, i've no idea how good the Sigma is though.
The Tamron equivalent with a constant f/2.8 would be better and would be a general portrait lens.

Comment by Anvh posted on Wedding Photography lens at 20/04/2010 - 12:42

Anvh
K10D wrote:
It is supposed to be distortion free?
They all say that
If it's the same as the 10-20 I don't think it will cut it

Comment by Anvh posted on Sigma 8-16mm priced in the USA at 20/04/2010 - 08:34

Anvh
Pentaxophile wrote:
and upgrade to the 16-45mm and 55-300mm lenses
I think those would be to slow, probably the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 or sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 might do (maybe not wide enough?) or the DA*16-50 with the DA*50-135 but sadly those are quite high in price right now.
You could also get the third party equivalent, the Tamron/Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 with the Sigma 50-150 f/2.8.

With one of these lenses or combination you're pretty much covered for portrait shoot of various group sizes and it does not get better then f/2.8 with zooms which is fast enough most of the times.

For portable studio, for portrait you might consider going the strobist way. A collapsible background with a stand and 2 flash stands with two umbrella's and normal flashguns would get you pretty far.

Comment by Anvh posted on Wedding Photography lens at 20/04/2010 - 00:21

Anvh
I wonder how the distortions are going to be with this lens.

Comment by Anvh posted on Sigma 8-16mm priced in the USA at 19/04/2010 - 22:11

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo