PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
Another vote for 'Three's a crowd'.

Funny, I never think of the 50-135mm as "travelling light"

K.

Comment by womble posted on Streets of Newcastle at 01/03/2012 - 09:49

womble
I usually send a cheque and accept that there'll be a delay while it clears. (You'll note that I tend to buy more often than I sell...) Probably the best thing is to give people the choice: paypal (plus fees), bank transfer or cheque (with delay).

K.

Comment by womble posted on Payment Options at 01/03/2012 - 08:10

womble
Algernon wrote:
I also bought a K2 when they first came out and thought it was a great camera. I was surprised to see in AP that Ivor Matanle's 2006 review that AP's original test was not a total success as the shutter speeds showed substantial inaccuracies

Probably worth getting the speeds checked?
If you are intending to use a forty year old camera, a CLA (which would include a shutter speed check) is worth the money IMHO, even when the charge is more than the camera is worth on paper. There are good (and quite cheap) shutter speed testers available on ebay for the DIY inclined.

I've had some of my cameras CLA'ed (my LX, MX, ME Super, ME-F, ESII), some I have just got on with it (especially my ES which seems fine, and the SFXn). I'm umming and ahhhing about whether to send one of the old screw mounts in next (the H2 or the S1a?) or the Program A which has a dodgy shutter button. Oh, and my Horizont panoramic camera needs the seals doing around the swinging lens mechanism. Perhaps I should do that first. Oh, decisions, decisions...

Comment by womble posted on K2, KX, KM, K1000 ? at 29/02/2012 - 16:36

womble
Oso wrote:
I never had any problem with the ISO ring, Kris, I'm also looking for the K2DMD, Regards

Oso
I get the impression it is a problem with cameras that have been in storage for a while. As always, however, the 'net tends to emphasise the problems more than the lack of them! I was just speculating as the reasons behind the earlier post.

K.

Comment by womble posted on K2, KX, KM, K1000 ? at 29/02/2012 - 10:24

womble
Given the original post was three months ago you might be better off just putting in a advert.

K,

Comment by womble posted on WTB - 70-200 2,8 Sigma,Tamron, Tokina etc... at 28/02/2012 - 21:37

womble

Comment by womble posted on Sensor developments. at 28/02/2012 - 10:37

womble
davidstorm wrote:
womble wrote:

I have one of those but prefer my K28/3.5.

K.
Is the glass in the M 28mm F3.5 the same optics as your version? I have the M 28mm F3.5 and advertised it recently for £45 but got no interest whatsoever. I would have thought someone would have wanted it? It is absolutely mint with original case.

Regards
David

PS I've taken it off sale now as I'm not letting it go for next to nothing.
No. The K version is a 8-7 formula and the M version is 6-6. The M28/3.5 is reputedly better than the M28/2.8 and the K28/3.5 is reputedly better than the M28/3.5. I occasionally think about testing my various 28s against each other but usually I end up deciding that going out and taking photographs is more worthwhile!

You're right not to sell the M28/3.5 for peanuts as it is a lovely lens. I already have one which is why I didn't snap it up.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Which one should I keep? at 27/02/2012 - 22:26

womble
Refconvertors are quite difficult to find. The type that fit Spotmatic sized viewfinders are more common but are too small for the size used from the M series cameras to the present day. There are cheapo 3rd party ones available from ?Seagull on ebay but I have heard mixed reviews about them.

When they do come up for sale, they are pretty pricey.

Shooting film, I use my LX with one of the interchangeable prisms.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Ref Converter (Right Angled Viewer) at 27/02/2012 - 20:29

womble
I have no idea how this could be. My only (wild) guess is the Pentax lens has a damaged mount?

K.

Comment by womble posted on Strange Behaviour in Pentax ME Super at 27/02/2012 - 20:02

womble
johnriley wrote:
There's nothing dead about film. I'm thinking of shooting some for fun myself, but need a really nice manual classic film body to make it even more interesting.
I'll be selling a very nice condition Pentax MX. One of the few I have seen without dings in the top plate although I fear the various foam seals and bumpers need doing.

K.

Comment by womble posted on film storage in fridge at 27/02/2012 - 19:55

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo