RAW is so much fun, you can do all sorts of silly things to it without getting banding or other problems.

Most of the time I just make adjustments to WB and a couple of pictures which were slightly off and then export JPEGs if I want to use them immediately. Otherwise they just stay stored on my hard disk.

Can you circle it in red or something as I really am confused as to what you are referring.

Sorry, but blue and green colour where? Do you mean white balance? I can't see anything wrong with that picture so it may be you monitor calibration. I assume you have not calibrated your screen to match prints or real colours.

An old Canon Powershot did it and was set up via USB cable. It would not be difficult to do at all, and you could add all sorts of information.

I was wondering whether it is possible to get the K10D to automatically add name and copyright information to the EXIF data within the camera. At the moment I add it during import into Lightroom which isn't difficult but I was hoping images could be written with it.

Damn! I forked out for a DryZone Rover on the 30th!

You can get cheaper macs, but even then they don't come close to a PC (not necessarily Windows based) for speed. Prices vary across the range, but when I speced up a new 17" Macbook Pro to match my current machine it came up at more than my current machine was new. In terms of performance specification is identical and my machine was around over 16 months before the Mac (yes it is also a notebook). They are not what I'd call value of money at all, especially with the software and hardware limitations.

This debate could go on for a very long time, people can get whatever they like and more importantly need.

I love Macs, they're just too damn expensive.

Well apple have finally cottoned on to the fact that people want 1920x1200 screens on their notebooks. Although they still have not cottoned on to the fact that you can get them for £999 with higher specs than their £2500 machines.