strumstrum

Joined: 12th March 2013

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

strumstrum
I use soft proofing in LR4 sometimes, but I just prefer to make a small print first, I do quite a few A3+ prints but I also buy the exact same paper in 6x4 and use those first.. its very rarely needed as I am calibrated and profiled not too bad..

you could consider a colour munki? or borrow a Spyder?

Comment by strumstrum posted on Soft Proofing at 18/03/2013 - 18:17

strumstrum
johnriley wrote:
Discontinued is a great time to get a bargain.
that's why I purchased one and well chuffed I did never known a mirrorless format to focus so fast; love it.

Comment by strumstrum posted on K01 Or Q? at 18/03/2013 - 12:53

strumstrum
I am stunned how quick and accurate the k-01 focuses, and that includes low light.. I had a Pana GF3, Oly Pen and Sony NEX-5 to base it on and it strips all of them to bits, I 100% trust it.. not sure how the Q compares tho.

Comment by strumstrum posted on K01 Or Q? at 17/03/2013 - 20:02

strumstrum
18-55 much too close for portraits IMO, I mainly used a 70-200 in Canon for sit down or H&S portraits and the reason I wanted the 50-135 is it will act as a great general wedding lens and portrait at the 135mm end, I like to be at least 12' away and when using 3 lights 15'+.

Comment by strumstrum posted on Portrait lens at 17/03/2013 - 19:52

strumstrum
Thanks all. 120-400 ordered.. was the way I was leaning toward as I have never had anything over 300mm but mainly the longest I have had and for the past few years is 70-200 so it has that something new feeling.

Comment by strumstrum posted on worth paying double to get a Siggy 120-400 over the Pentax 55-300mm? at 17/03/2013 - 18:03

strumstrum
I am not a massive telephoto user but I do like going walkabouts with my friend shooting wildlife and enjoy rutting season and like the odd wednesday at mallory park..

in Canon I did this with a 70-200 L glass and yes I had to crop with small birds but they kept the sharpness good enough..

now I have got everything now that I thought essential and have some spare funds so I was quite prepared to get the 55-300 off Amazon @ £257 with £20 going back to my Amazon account so making it £237..

the I started looking at the Sigma 120-400 on SRS, I am tempted but and more so if its worth the extra money, the extra size & weight is not an issue and its the top end of my available funds but again if its worth it I don't mind..

any thoughts, real time feedback appreciated... what I don't like about the 55-300mm is it overlaps my 55-135 but that is pretty low down on the list of reasons not to choose that lens..

Ta

Comment by strumstrum posted on worth paying double to get a Siggy 120-400 over the Pentax 55-300mm? at 17/03/2013 - 14:06

strumstrum
hi PIRATE, any chance you can point me in the direction of the 530 DG super for £75 please is you are not having it.

Thanks

Comment by strumstrum posted on Tilt/Swivel Flashgun Advice Sought at 15/03/2013 - 18:30

strumstrum
have picked up a 540 for £182.50 delivered, its from a place which I have purchased stuff before and can be a bit hit and miss(more hits than misses though) but it comes with warranty so I think it was worth a punt at that price. we shall see when it arrives... if not it will go back and I will have to look again.

Ta

Comment by strumstrum posted on Pentax flash advice/info form an ex Canon/Nikon user at 15/03/2013 - 15:34

strumstrum
lens here, paid £628.50 delivered in the end from Stafford Cameras, all seems in order not sure what year it is but it looks pretty newish.. I am pretty happy.

Comment Image

Comment by strumstrum posted on is a Pentax 50-135 2.8 a 50-135 2.8? at 15/03/2013 - 12:08

strumstrum
just seen this, I'd like to jump in when you sort out a date, I am only 6 miles away from the farm so would be rude not to

Comment by strumstrum posted on A meeting in leicester? at 14/03/2013 - 18:05

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo