All Forum Comments
Comment by spinno posted on What's bad about this? C & C Please. at 19/05/2015 - 09:25
Provided your audience aren't nosing up to the print that may be acceptable.
To test this you could do a print of a section of your image at the different sizes and "stand back" and see what they would look like at the various pixels per inch.
(I'm damn sure that someone will come on and correct me for using the terminology pixels/inches for printing but this is how I work I'm not a qualified printer (or anything for that matter))
Comment by spinno posted on Print sizes at 19/05/2015 - 08:27
Yes of course
Comment by spinno posted on Pentax system to sell, please see list at 18/05/2015 - 21:38
Comment by spinno posted on Full Frame announcement ! at 14/05/2015 - 17:05
Comment by spinno posted on Bristol Exhibition at 14/05/2015 - 17:03
Glad to see you're using and enjoying it
Comment by spinno posted on Local hurling match at 14/05/2015 - 10:06
Comment by spinno posted on 15mm f4 - soft copy? at 13/05/2015 - 09:47
I live in Wales, what is a cloudless sky ::
Comment by spinno posted on Compare WR to non WR lenses at 10/05/2015 - 19:36
Comment by spinno posted on FRUSTRATED! - sigma DG 150 -500mm APO HSM at 10/05/2015 - 11:31


To me the image is of some wind blown large grass/reed type plants... if that's what it is then I think "acceptable" needs defining. Other than that nothing strikes me as obviously wrong.