All Forum Comments
Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 12/09/2009 - 16:31
Comment by RR posted on Through The Forest at 12/09/2009 - 12:06
It can overexpose slightly on scenes with very bright highlights, but only by 2 thirds of a stop at most, which can easily be dialled out using EV compensation.
The last half dozen shots on my Flickr were taken with my adaptall Mike.
Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 12/09/2009 - 12:03
Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 12/09/2009 - 11:06
Comment by RR posted on Self portraits at 11/09/2009 - 22:21
Comment by RR posted on Self portraits at 11/09/2009 - 22:17
Comment by RR posted on Avatars, Camera Bags & Crossing Paths at 11/09/2009 - 19:44
By the way, is there much money to be made with alamy ?
Comment by RR posted on Could you please keep your eyes peeled... at 11/09/2009 - 19:07
Let us know how you get on, as I'm sure there are a few who would be interested in a tilt/shift option. I'm looking at Womble on this one !
Comment by RR posted on Arax Tilt/Shift at 11/09/2009 - 18:59
Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 11/09/2009 - 15:20


Have to say write up on latest Nikon300s makes for interesting reading .
One just has to face up to the fact whatever you buy will be out of date in 12 months time( or even less).
Which would one you lot go for and why..unbiassed opinons only
if it beats the 50D Canon its good enough for me,just hope the kit lenses are good enough .
IMHO an out of date camera is only one that can't be used any more, for example, if the film type is no longer available.
Even that is often not insurmountable though, although electronic cameras do become defunct when the batteries or electronics are no longer replaceable.
Pentax currently offer three DSLRs, all of which are perfectly well useable and "up to date" compared with offerings from their competitors. There isn't anything in terms of photography that you can't do with them, so how much more do we need them to be?