RR

Joined: 3rd December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

RR
Quote:
Have to say write up on latest Nikon300s makes for interesting reading .

One just has to face up to the fact whatever you buy will be out of date in 12 months time( or even less).
Quote:
Which would one you lot go for and why..unbiassed opinons only
Quote:
if it beats the 50D Canon its good enough for me,just hope the kit lenses are good enough .
hkwiles wrote:
johnriley wrote:
IMHO an out of date camera is only one that can't be used any more, for example, if the film type is no longer available.

Even that is often not insurmountable though, although electronic cameras do become defunct when the batteries or electronics are no longer replaceable.

Pentax currently offer three DSLRs, all of which are perfectly well useable and "up to date" compared with offerings from their competitors. There isn't anything in terms of photography that you can't do with them, so how much more do we need them to be?
I agree entirely ..so why ll the fuss when a new camera comes out and all the nit picking about specs ?
I think I missed something... are you bipolar ?

Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 12/09/2009 - 16:31

RR
I like the dappled sunlight on the ground & trunk but the greens are somewhat over-saturated for me.

Comment by RR posted on Through The Forest at 12/09/2009 - 12:06

RR
I can only speak with the D700, I have just the one adaptall & it works very well. You set the maximum f stop & focal length in the menu & away to go. I think it'll only store 8 different non cpu lenses, but it's only 2 settings so no great hardship if you have loads. Just have to remember to change the settings when mounting the lens.
It can overexpose slightly on scenes with very bright highlights, but only by 2 thirds of a stop at most, which can easily be dialled out using EV compensation.

The last half dozen shots on my Flickr were taken with my adaptall Mike.

Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 12/09/2009 - 12:03

RR
Mike, the adapters for Nikon include an element to correct for infinity focus, so not the best quality unfortunately.

Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 12/09/2009 - 11:06

RR
I'm not kidding at the film-like appearance though... was this taken with an older lens (which I've found give those nice muddy colours) or was it achieved in post process ?

Comment by RR posted on Self portraits at 11/09/2009 - 22:21

RR
The 2nd has a very film-like appearance & looking at those red shorts I'm guessing it's bona-fide 70's

Comment by RR posted on Self portraits at 11/09/2009 - 22:17

RR
Why not just wear the camera strap as a headband ?

Comment by RR posted on Avatars, Camera Bags & Crossing Paths at 11/09/2009 - 19:44

RR
Sorry, didn't actually respond to this one, just mentally absorbed the photo in readiness. I'm sure we'll all keep an eye out for you Daniel.

By the way, is there much money to be made with alamy ?

Comment by RR posted on Could you please keep your eyes peeled... at 11/09/2009 - 19:07

RR
Hi JN, welcome to Pentax user. The exact same lens is available HERE - whilst I have no personal experience, I have read ok reports of this particular seller on the web but I'd advise you to do some more research. Just thought I'd open the options up for you, as there seems to be more reference to them in various forums.

Let us know how you get on, as I'm sure there are a few who would be interested in a tilt/shift option. I'm looking at Womble on this one !

Comment by RR posted on Arax Tilt/Shift at 11/09/2009 - 18:59

RR
Moore's Law explains the smaller, faster, cheaper philosophy.

Comment by RR posted on What Camera Review at 11/09/2009 - 15:20

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo