Self portraits
Posted 11/09/2009 - 22:10
Link
I really like the simplicity of the first, it's got great composition and the colours work very well. It's a shot you can study and admire for a moment or two; the reflection draws you in.
For me the second is a bit too busy with the reflection and the background. There's too much going on for me.
For me the second is a bit too busy with the reflection and the background. There's too much going on for me.
Posted 11/09/2009 - 22:16
Link
Unfortunately the image size isn't sufficent for this to really work well, but what I'd be inclined to do with the first one is something like this:
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/044-Oggy-1.jpg[/IMG]
I might even go closer, but it doesn't leave anything recognisable at these file sizes!
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/044-Oggy-1.jpg[/IMG]
I might even go closer, but it doesn't leave anything recognisable at these file sizes!
Best regards, John
Posted 11/09/2009 - 22:20
Link
Nice shorts!
.........all the gear, no idea!
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
Posted 11/09/2009 - 22:28
Link
johnriley wrote:
Unfortunately the image size isn't sufficent for this to really work well, but what I'd be inclined to do with the first one is something like this:
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/044-Oggy-1.jpg[/IMG]
I might even go closer, but it doesn't leave anything recognisable at these file sizes!
Oh what a shame!Unfortunately the image size isn't sufficent for this to really work well, but what I'd be inclined to do with the first one is something like this:
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/044-Oggy-1.jpg[/IMG]
I might even go closer, but it doesn't leave anything recognisable at these file sizes!
(Tongue in cheek smiley please)
Thanks for the replies Folks
The lens in both cases was a DA*16-50.
The muddy colour may well be down to the amount of coal burning around the place.
Posted 12/09/2009 - 00:35
Link
I have to say what John has done with the first shot is quite spectacular.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



2406 posts
17 years
Worthing
If anyone wants to take a picture of me, I would recommend a 1000mm lens and a TC.
So here's two of me
[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/IMGP4304.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/IMGP4303.jpg[/IMG]
Any and all thoughts appreciated, and by all means PP them.
Thanks for looking.