pgweber

Joined: 25th July 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

pgweber
Conqueror wrote:
Quote:
Nothing wrong with the budget 50mm f1.8 and 35mm f2.4, if cost is a concern.
+1 to this also
Are you saying that these DA lenses cover the FF sensor?

(Not that I am looking. Would like a K1 with better AF, maybe my arrow of choice points the opposite way to the O/P?)

Comment by pgweber posted on Glass for a K1 at 07/12/2016 - 09:34

pgweber
Me too.
28.1% and 4 viruses as well.
On this site with my Android mobile phone.

Comment by pgweber posted on Warning system damaged on Google?? at 24/11/2016 - 17:56

pgweber
SteveF wrote:
Maybe it's too obvious, but no-one has mentioned switching the camera off before changing a lens. I picked this up a long time ago from somewhere, I don't remember where.
I follow the same rule.
I think I read that it lessens the electrostatic attraction of dust particles to the sensor with the power off.

Comment by pgweber posted on Changing lenses at 17/11/2016 - 13:29

pgweber
Digital Camera says:
The Pentax K1 has an excellent collection of features that will appeal to serious photographers, and it feels good in your hand. It makes a great choice for landscape and still-life photographers, but sports shooters should look elsewhere for a camera with a fast auto focus system and a higher continuous shooting rate.
Feafures 4.5; Build & Handling 3.5; Performance 3.5; Value 4; Overall 3.5

You win some, you lose some!

Comment by pgweber posted on Amateur Photographer gives K1 a gold award at 06/09/2016 - 23:51

pgweber
Some interesting behaviour being described in the latest postings.
How do users find the DC motor - does that aid faster (and more accurate) focussing?

Comment by pgweber posted on 16-85 vs 16-45 at 29/08/2016 - 11:28

pgweber
Thanks Gavin and Bruce for your comments too.
Not yet stacking up to make an overwhelming case to upgrade.

Comment by pgweber posted on 16-85 vs 16-45 at 28/08/2016 - 23:56

pgweber
Thank you 'miles500' for your comments about the 16-85.

I currently have the 16-45 but was wondering if the 16-85 is a worthwhile upgrade.
I have other lenses which cover the 45-85 range, so it is a case of weighing up WR benefits, focus speed/accuracy and IQ. The wide to moderate telephoto convenience is another factor.

Comment by pgweber posted on 16-85 vs 16-45 at 28/08/2016 - 18:45

pgweber
Anyone, what does WTD stand for please?

Comment by pgweber posted on [WTD] Pentax k5 body, da 50mm f1.8, da16-45 at 27/08/2016 - 20:00

pgweber
I would be grateful to hear the comments of users with experience of both of the aforementioned lenses.

I can see the possible advantages of the 16-85 being WR and having longer reach.
I note that some have said the build quality is superior to the 16-45.

However I would like to know about IQ and AF performance.

I can't see lots being written about the 16-85 - has the take up been low due to the wait for FF?

Comment by pgweber posted on 16-85 vs 16-45 at 26/08/2016 - 22:30

pgweber
Just a reminder about SI units and prefixes:

Prefixes: milli = m, mega = M
Unit of current = Amperes (or Amps) denoted by A.

mA = thousandths of an Amp
MA = millions of Amps

Therefore mA.h to denote the product of current & time, in relation to camera batteries (where h = hours).

Comment by pgweber posted on Purchasing replacement D-L190 for the K-5 at 22/06/2016 - 19:42

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo