All Forum Comments
Comment by petrochemist posted on Im new user to Pentax at 02/10/2014 - 08:35
Comment by petrochemist posted on Explaining the numbers on lenses at 09/09/2014 - 23:03
Mike
Comment by petrochemist posted on Back copies of Pentax magazines at 09/09/2014 - 11:16
Nothing like this though!
Comment by petrochemist posted on I'm walking the cat at 26/08/2014 - 13:27
If that's the case then all he has to do is click on the link to find out.
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Comment by petrochemist posted on The Truth at 10/08/2014 - 21:48
What chance of seeing the moon this evening. Racing clouds, heavy rain showers and blustery winds!
The moon tends to look better when not quite full.
The heavy winds & rain definitely weren't ideal for our club photo display today (part of the Clacton Carnival 'Fun day').
The Marquee we were original due to be sharing with a local artist, apparently disappeared in the night, so we had to make do with an open fronted Gazebo! Fortunately some of the mounted prints could be swapped for Laminated ones So I think things worked out as well as could be expected.
Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 10/08/2014 - 21:44
Maybe spot metering would be best, with some plus compensation ?
Despite the common view that the moon is up at night, it's actually in the day time sky just as much as the night time sky. However most of us only photograph it at night where its so much more visible.
Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 07/08/2014 - 08:29
Sure it's on a forum here somewhere but as we are talking about photographing the moon, could someone give me a steer as to the best camera settings and lens combo in order to have a chance of getting a half decent shot?
Would be using a K3 if that helps.
ie use 1/iso seconds at F11 & adjust as required for f stop.
Your unlikely to have a lens that can't fit all the moon in, even a 1000mm lens leave plenty of sky.
The moon moves surprisingly fast at these sorts of magnifications so you'll need to shot fairly fast. (DOF is not an issue)
Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 06/08/2014 - 21:08
Gwyn definitely got the last line of her post above right - this whole thread is a lesson in lunacy!
Myles
Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 06/08/2014 - 18:14
The moon reaches perigee and apogee every month, though the actual distances vary slightly per month, and don't always occur at, or near to full. Perigee affects the tides - causing spring tides.
There is however a 'Proxigean spring tide' which is a particularly high spring tide when the moon is at perigee. These occur roughly every 1½ years, though of course some are significantly bigger than others. Apparently the extreme ones are about every 30 years.
Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 06/08/2014 - 09:15


In what way do apertures work differently ? I was not aware of this.
Apertures work the same way, but a smaller aperture will be needed to get the same DOF. If you've got used to f16 giving enough DOF with APSC it might not be enough for 645...
Welcome to PU Frank, I hope the switch to 645 works out well for you!