petrochemist

Joined: 27th February 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

petrochemist
judderman62 wrote:
In what way do apertures work differently ? I was not aware of this.
Frank is talking of medium format, where the bigger sensor gets less DOF.
Apertures work the same way, but a smaller aperture will be needed to get the same DOF. If you've got used to f16 giving enough DOF with APSC it might not be enough for 645...

Welcome to PU Frank, I hope the switch to 645 works out well for you!

Comment by petrochemist posted on Im new user to Pentax at 02/10/2014 - 08:35

petrochemist
Aperture is indeed a ratio, it's the ratio of the opening through which light can enter to the focal length of the lens. It's often abbreviated.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Explaining the numbers on lenses at 09/09/2014 - 23:03

petrochemist
There are a few that are missing from my collection. If you have those I'd certainly be interetsed - I'll check which I'm missing & get back to you
Mike

Comment by petrochemist posted on Back copies of Pentax magazines at 09/09/2014 - 11:16

petrochemist
We used to have a cat that would often join us on Dog walks. (She would usually go back after half a mile or so)

Nothing like this though!

Comment by petrochemist posted on I'm walking the cat at 26/08/2014 - 13:27

petrochemist
davidtrout wrote:
If that's the case then all he has to do is click on the link to find out.
David

PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
I've often followed blind links such as this to find they go to a video clip that exceeds my allotted bandwidth. Generally now I don't bother with them. So I quite agree some description of the link would be a benefit.

Comment by petrochemist posted on The Truth at 10/08/2014 - 21:48

petrochemist
mayday wrote:
What chance of seeing the moon this evening. Racing clouds, heavy rain showers and blustery winds!
Should make for more interesting photos than a full moon IMO.
The moon tends to look better when not quite full.

The heavy winds & rain definitely weren't ideal for our club photo display today (part of the Clacton Carnival 'Fun day').
The Marquee we were original due to be sharing with a local artist, apparently disappeared in the night, so we had to make do with an open fronted Gazebo! Fortunately some of the mounted prints could be swapped for Laminated ones So I think things worked out as well as could be expected.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 10/08/2014 - 21:44

petrochemist
McGregNi wrote:
Maybe spot metering would be best, with some plus compensation ?
Spot metering generally gives reasonable results, but I wouldn't make it any longer it very easy o blow out all the detail in the moon. Its (nearly always) in full sunshine so quite bright, while all around it is effectively black in most shots.
Despite the common view that the moon is up at night, it's actually in the day time sky just as much as the night time sky. However most of us only photograph it at night where its so much more visible.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 07/08/2014 - 08:29

petrochemist
mayday wrote:
Sure it's on a forum here somewhere but as we are talking about photographing the moon, could someone give me a steer as to the best camera settings and lens combo in order to have a chance of getting a half decent shot?
Would be using a K3 if that helps.
IIRC the guide for the moon (nicknamed looney 11) is similar to the sunny 16 rule but with f11 instead of f16.
ie use 1/iso seconds at F11 & adjust as required for f stop.

Your unlikely to have a lens that can't fit all the moon in, even a 1000mm lens leave plenty of sky.

The moon moves surprisingly fast at these sorts of magnifications so you'll need to shot fairly fast. (DOF is not an issue)

Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 06/08/2014 - 21:08

petrochemist
myles wrote:
Gwyn definitely got the last line of her post above right - this whole thread is a lesson in lunacy!

Myles
The line before that too, though I might extend it to a week before & after.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 06/08/2014 - 18:14

petrochemist
Gwyn wrote:
The moon reaches perigee and apogee every month, though the actual distances vary slightly per month, and don't always occur at, or near to full. Perigee affects the tides - causing spring tides.
Spring tides are due to the addition of both solar tides & lunar tides i.e. The gravitation bulge caused by the sun adding to that caused by the moon. You'll find they always occur at full moons & new moons, when the sun is in line with the moon, which strongly suggests the distance of the moon is not the controlling factor for this phenomena!

There is however a 'Proxigean spring tide' which is a particularly high spring tide when the moon is at perigee. These occur roughly every 1½ years, though of course some are significantly bigger than others. Apparently the extreme ones are about every 30 years.

Comment by petrochemist posted on Super Moon at 06/08/2014 - 09:15

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo