Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
Roy3 wrote:
Both shots were over saturated with highlight & shadow clipping.
I adjusted the saturation on both images to the same value in Lightroom.
The difference in image quality has totally changed my mind about using Jpeg.
I have switched back to Raw, permanently!
I dunno if it's just me, but I have found that changes made to jpegs in lightroom have a more drastic effect than they do with RAW shots.

I took an overexposed shot the other week, and it gave me the chance to compare how I could recover the highlights both in RAW (Lightroom) and Jpeg (CS3).

Original shot (1:1 crop):Comment Image


Edited Jpeg:Comment Image


Edite RAW:Comment Image

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Raw v Jpeg at 08/05/2011 - 19:17

Pentaxophile
Very interesting, colourful and well captured. But this reminds me of a particularly nasty scene from The Mist...

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Strange fruit... at 08/05/2011 - 13:17

Pentaxophile
We're drifting away from the topic, but I'll add that the Tamron 17-50mm is a very versatile lens - it does shallow dof very well without being soft at wider apertures, and of course it's great stopped down too.

Back to the OP's topic, I'd recommend the sigma 10-20mm or the more expensive pentax 12-24mm. I believe the sigma IQ can rival the pentax if you take care to find the 'sweet spots' - for me this is 12mm at f8-f11, when the sigma's distortion is considerably reduced. You can afford to stop down becuase ultrawides are tolerant of hand holding especially with SR. Speeds of 1/4s are not unusable if you can brace the camera and breathe out slowly while taking the shot

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 14mm or 15mm at 08/05/2011 - 12:53

Pentaxophile
I have had the Helios 44-4K for a few days (an excellent buy from Vince), and although I haven't had chance to take any 'proper' pictures with it yet, I can confirm everyone's observations with the 'swirly bokeh' (swirl-keh). It's as if the background of the shot has a rotational blur to it....

Comment Image


But what on earth causes this strange - and to my eyes quite attractive - effect? :

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Curiously Swirly Helios at 08/05/2011 - 00:32

Pentaxophile
Now THAT is a shot! I love how it blends in. A bit of contrast and warm up would improve it IMO.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Just back from safari at 07/05/2011 - 22:06

Pentaxophile
Sour grapes, folks. Pentax already have a head start over the Nikon and Canon FF line ups. They have the 31, 43 and 77 FA ltds - lenses which are 'suboptimal' on APSC.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax FF - a poll at 07/05/2011 - 20:30

Pentaxophile
Just the 800 Dave? Great first shot, I am very jealous of your choice of holiday!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Just back from safari at 06/05/2011 - 19:30

Pentaxophile
Not going to comment on the first shot!

Excellent set though, only the blown windows in no.2 lets it down.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Winchester Cathedral, first shots on Tamron 17-50. at 05/05/2011 - 20:13

Pentaxophile
Well the condition of the lens really is 'as new' like you described Vince. It's a solidly crafted lump of metal and glass that puts modern lenses - even DA Ltds - to shame in terms of build quality. And I'm seeing the famous swirl-keh in early test shots - great stuff!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on FS: Helios 58mm F2 44k-4 (k-mount ver) at 05/05/2011 - 20:04

Pentaxophile
Looks great! Had never heard of Cafenol. What do you use as fixer? Don't tell me PG tips lol

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Coffee anyone? at 05/05/2011 - 13:58

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo