Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
That first one is great! Nice set.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on A few from NYC at 15/05/2011 - 23:18

Pentaxophile
Given we're always b*tching about the tat that does make it onto PPG, it's very brave of people to post their rejections

Aliengrove's abstract would have got my vote for sure, though! I am guessing people aren't looking closely enough to realist it's not digitally manipulated.

What is PPG for anyway?

I've uploaded shots to it for the satisfaction of having my own little gallery, but apart from voting, I can't say I spend much time looking at the pictures.

Damn things so slow and hard to navigate I wonder if anyone else does too!

If Pentax want a high-end online gallery to show what their kit can do, perhaps they ought to hunt down good images from Flickr and then offer the photographers a 'Premiere Collection' gallery on PPG.

Or they could update their Pentaxian site with some more photographers using newer kit than the K10D!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax Photo Gallery - Favourite Rejections at 15/05/2011 - 19:33

Pentaxophile
On your third JD then Baz?

Wish I had some alcohol in the house...

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 14/05/2011 - 22:06

Pentaxophile
Northgrain wrote:
Watching euro song contest. Moldova's going to get my vote. Psychodelic gnomes, one on a unicycle. What's not to like?
Me too. They remind me of Devo! I fear it will be a case of pearls before swine though.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Another pointless thread at 14/05/2011 - 21:59

Pentaxophile
Can I mention one of my pet peeves? Some people are so phobic about burnt highlights that they go overboard with overexposed shots in PP, pushing the recovery slider so far over to the right that anything white in the photo goes a solid grey.

White clouds are not inappropriate - that's actually how they tend to look!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Blown Highlights - OK or not? at 14/05/2011 - 20:31

Pentaxophile
Another 'No' from me. It's far from ideal, but sometimes you have to compromise - blown highlights or unacceptably dark shadow areas... the shot's interesting enough to overlook technical imperfection, IMO.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Blown Highlights - OK or not? at 14/05/2011 - 19:57

Pentaxophile
I'd go with the Tamron unless weather sealing is an absolute must! The IQ of the Tamron more than gives the 16-50mm a run for its money and it's much cheaper and smaller. (It's shorter and only slightly wider than the 16-45mm for example).

OTOH the extra 1mm really makes a difference!

But you already have a fairly fast and pretty good lens in the 17-70mm. I'm not sure I'd be feeling a particularly strong urge to upgrade if I was you, especially if it means sacrificing the 50-70mm range...

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Help with choosing between DA*16-50/2.8 vs. Tamron 17-50/2.8 at 14/05/2011 - 19:48

Pentaxophile
I really like the first one, it really pops out and the setting complete with leaning gravestone is very nice.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Surprise encounter with Turdidae in Wiltshire churchyard! at 13/05/2011 - 19:16

Pentaxophile
Having a discussion in a classified thread? tut tut!

Pawel, I note K100d knock-off grips are still available on ebay for c£30... It is a shame your client is so blinkered but hey.

Alternatively you could consider renting a K5 from SRS

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Wanted: K100d grip at 13/05/2011 - 16:06

Pentaxophile
Put one in an ants nest and the formic acid turns it pink

I have noticed that the colour of bluebells seems particularly hard to record faithfully.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Ben Hall - Digital Manipulation at 13/05/2011 - 13:40

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo