Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
Have you tried Live View autofocus? This lens should be sharp wide open...

Comment Image


Comment Image

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on NOT HAPPY with my DA 35mm F2.4AL at 17/01/2012 - 22:46

Pentaxophile
It's been an eye opener how easily the 15mm can be used for panos. I used to think that wide angle lenses were unsuitable for panos because of their distortion... apparently not so!

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Larger images here - the largest size versions have so much detail it almost feels like you're there! http://www.flickr.com/photos/28055843@N04/sets/72157628917127897/with/6462675603/

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on DA15mm Ltd for Panoramas at 17/01/2012 - 22:17

Pentaxophile
You can compare the optical formulas at the PF lens database - if this is the F3.5-4.5 version, I believe the optical design is the same.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on A 35-70MM at 17/01/2012 - 21:44

Pentaxophile
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
If you're going for a Pentax lens the K or M 28mm f/3.5 versions are optically similar but both very, very sharp (at least on digital), and made for landscapes.
The K lens is a different formula and supposedly better but both are very good lenses. If you have the choice, get the K (the K versions are usually slightly better than their 'miniturised' M counterparts).

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Wide angle prime k mount for Pentax MX? at 17/01/2012 - 21:32

Pentaxophile
I would be looking at reviews and sample images from the Pentax K or M 28/3.5, K or M 20/4 and K 24/2.8.

Another contender would be the Sigma SuperwideII which is sharper than the K 24/2.8 but not as 'proper' looking on the MX nor quite as good colour/contrast perhaps... (you can tweak those in PP though...)

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Wide angle prime k mount for Pentax MX? at 17/01/2012 - 21:15

Pentaxophile
nanhi wrote:
I think two very important points have been left out: a) the Sigma 70-300 is a Full Frame lens while the DA 55-300 is NOT.
The DA55-300mm is FF compatible, as are a few of the other DA lenses

These lenses will lose the sweet spot advantage, but a larger sensor will be beneficial to the resolution they can deliver (larger imaging area = less demanding on lenses).

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Tameron/Pentax at 17/01/2012 - 18:21

Pentaxophile
5.99 would be a good price for the adapter alone, let alone for the lens as well! Is it a PK or PKA adapter? If the latter, it was even more of a steal.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Tamron 85-210mm F4 Macro at 17/01/2012 - 18:05

Pentaxophile
Definitely should have click stops.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on A 35-70MM at 17/01/2012 - 13:29

Pentaxophile
Quite a nice set, I like the last one and the phone box is also good (needs straightening perhaps?) - but someone needs to get busy with the rocketblower, I think!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Views from London this weekend at 17/01/2012 - 10:28

Pentaxophile
It's hard to tell when Gary is being serious sometimes, but I think the point about the benefit of raw being overstated, may have been precisely the point he was making, in a backhanded sort of way.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on RAW or JPG shootout (handbags at dawn) at 17/01/2012 - 00:15

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo