All Forum Comments
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Are photographers....... at 24/09/2009 - 18:03
Just a quick question regarding the above, I've just recently purchased the M 200 f4 and was looking to compliment it with it's smaller brother. The problem seems to be varied reports of the 135mm, some say it's barely OK but others think it's fantastic so I'm unsure as to whether to go ahead and buy one.
Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Pentax M 135mm f3.5 at 24/09/2009 - 17:11
After reviewing Hefty's comments regarding my own entry, I have to agree that the border was an unnecessary addition and is far better without it. Sometimes you need other peoples' viewpoint to make you understand your own composition better.
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Fortnightly Competition #23 The Ground at 02/09/2009 - 20:27
[IMG]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f343/Noddy750/DockingHols1041.jpg[/IMG]
Exif Data
Program: Manual
ISO: 100
Focal: 65mm
Exposure: 1/90
Metering: Spot
WB: Manual
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Fortnightly Competition #23 The Ground at 01/09/2009 - 08:15
I think Dan has discovered something about the life cycle of the damselfly that nobody had hitherto suspected.
G
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Who says you can't shoot bugs with the 35mm Macro? at 19/08/2009 - 11:53
To be honest I'm not sure about this one, being viewed on a small monitor I don't think the size does it justice, if it was about 12' x 4' on a gallery wall I think it would have a stunning effect. Good excuse to buy myself a bigger monitor me thinks. Still interesting and a brave post though.
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on MGB - 81 An Abstract at 18/08/2009 - 22:09
This is my sort of picture, quirky and off the wall.
If it wasn't for the red bottle it would be nothing.
Nice feel of depth as well.
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on I've Taken The Plunge at 18/08/2009 - 22:03
Cheers guys.
You are not wrong at all there Jack, the kit lens can be underestimated at times in favour of the 16-45 and the newer 17-70; though I've come to the conclusion that I have a very good copy of the kit lens.
Because of this I have'nt really been too interested in a replacement at those focal lengths, though the 17-70 does tempt me.
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on Outdoor portraits of my daughter at 18/08/2009 - 22:00
[IMG]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f343/Noddy750/DockingHols1096.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on I've Taken The Plunge at 18/08/2009 - 20:34
Comment by noddywithoutbigears posted on PENTAX Users Age *****POLL*** at 18/08/2009 - 16:34


Able to look at picture simply as a good composition or interesting subject , without having to disect the minutiae of the noise, sharpness etc etc . It seems looking round other the forums perfect exposure is the be all and end all of photography.
Howard