Outdoor portraits of my daughter
Posted 18/08/2009 - 00:10
Link
Excellent, the first one for me, a really nice portrait.
Best regards, John
Posted 18/08/2009 - 15:15
Link
johnriley wrote:
Excellent, the first one for me, a really nice portrait.
Excellent, the first one for me, a really nice portrait.
Glad you like it John - that's my favourite too, and is currently gracing my desktop wallpaper!
Posted 18/08/2009 - 16:08
Link
Excellent shots Bob number 3 for me
Posted 18/08/2009 - 16:30
Link
These are really nice - natural looking, and I'm not sure I could pick a favourite.
Dan
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 18/08/2009 - 16:56
Link
black and white for me!
Posted 18/08/2009 - 18:37
Link
Yes first shot for me to.
Posted 18/08/2009 - 18:56
Link
Thanks for the nice comments, I think it's interesting that there is a mix of which shots are your respective favourites.
Well...I'm about to complicate things...took her out for an adventure this afternoon, and I'm not sure anymore about a favourite as I can't decide.
As usual, 18-55MKII F8
And an odd one out....I pic I had to grab as I was driving past last night:
Well...I'm about to complicate things...took her out for an adventure this afternoon, and I'm not sure anymore about a favourite as I can't decide.
As usual, 18-55MKII F8
And an odd one out....I pic I had to grab as I was driving past last night:
Posted 18/08/2009 - 19:10
Link
From the first set, I like the movement and fun captured in shot 2... in this set, the first shot does it for me... it's a 'child's eye view'... I like the one of the gate too.
[link=https://500px.com/will_brealey/[/link]
Posted 18/08/2009 - 20:01
Link
1 and 2(from the second set) are excellent Bob i can't decide either.They are just as good as eack other.
Posted 18/08/2009 - 20:01
Link
All great shots and great memories of you daughter, It just shows you how underestimated the kit lens is,
Jack.
Jack.
Posted 18/08/2009 - 20:09
Link
Cheers guys.
You are not wrong at all there Jack, the kit lens can be underestimated at times in favour of the 16-45 and the newer 17-70; though I've come to the conclusion that I have a very good copy of the kit lens.
Because of this I have'nt really been too interested in a replacement at those focal lengths, though the 17-70 does tempt me.
You are not wrong at all there Jack, the kit lens can be underestimated at times in favour of the 16-45 and the newer 17-70; though I've come to the conclusion that I have a very good copy of the kit lens.
Because of this I have'nt really been too interested in a replacement at those focal lengths, though the 17-70 does tempt me.
Posted 18/08/2009 - 20:46
Link
Just realised I put the same pic up to Flickr twice...then deleted the wrong one
So here it is again....
So here it is again....
Posted 18/08/2009 - 22:00
Link
Snootchies wrote:
Cheers guys.
You are not wrong at all there Jack, the kit lens can be underestimated at times in favour of the 16-45 and the newer 17-70; though I've come to the conclusion that I have a very good copy of the kit lens.
Because of this I have'nt really been too interested in a replacement at those focal lengths, though the 17-70 does tempt me.
Cheers guys.
You are not wrong at all there Jack, the kit lens can be underestimated at times in favour of the 16-45 and the newer 17-70; though I've come to the conclusion that I have a very good copy of the kit lens.
Because of this I have'nt really been too interested in a replacement at those focal lengths, though the 17-70 does tempt me.
I really like these, so natural, well done, but as you say the kit lens is often overlooked in favour of something which is believed to be better and in most cases more expensive. Most lenses can out perform our ability anyway. Hurrah for the kit lens as you have kindly shown us.
A poor life this, if full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare. W.H Davies
We have no time to stand and stare. W.H Davies
Posted 18/08/2009 - 22:17
Link
No. 5 for me! Very nice angle
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1969 posts
16 years
Chester
What do you guys t'ink?
All taken at F8 with my 18-55MKII.
My website (Hadfield Photography)
Pentax Gallery Artist page:link
Flickr Photostream: link