All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on DA 17-70 - any tips? at 02/01/2013 - 17:04
Initial observation is that a tripod and very, very careful focusing will be needed. Plus lenses with an aperture ring will be most useful.
Although I have used the 50/1.4 handheld on the Q with fairly reasonable results - but my focusing was only very careful (and out)... should have been 'very, very careful'
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax Q Adapters at 27/12/2012 - 11:32
Just putting "Tree" does the job, or "The Tree" with "Search for this phrase" selected
Also, it's helpful to choose descending post time sort order.
HTH!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Forum Search at 23/12/2012 - 21:19
Wowza!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on I'm excited at 20/12/2012 - 17:08
I've got the 50/1.4 on the adapter - and the DOF is still very shallow with lovely bokeh!
Manual focus is extremely sensitive at f/1.4 though! The focus peaking helps, but you need a tripod really
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax Q + PK adaptor + 50mm f2 DOF? at 19/12/2012 - 16:54
If it was on the aperture blades you'll see it move with them. As it is, I can't see any breaks in the discolouration where the blades meet - so it's probably delamination.
Shame.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax A*200/2.8 at 19/12/2012 - 09:06
Have a look at his Potatoes image. I love the smooth tonality transitions.
If you want to fully appreciate it, download Issue 17 of F11-magazine, scoot to page 86, and watch it full screen on a calibrated monitor (not too close though, as the resolution isn't quite up there). Amazing.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax Full Frame at 18/12/2012 - 09:00
Matt, what happened to Sharpen-o-Matic, was it overtaken by improvements in software and cameras?
In the early days of sharpening, I did find that the green channel required less sharpening (since there are twice as many green pixels). But, yes, these days the sharpening in LR is excellent.
Also worth mentioning is that the lens correction in LR4.1 makes a HUGE difference to perceived sharpness too. For example, the DA12-24 gives a great images, but when corrected (for CA & distortion) the sharpness goes up by a mile - especially on the corners. Likewise, the other day I had to process an image for inclusion in a book (hooray). It's taken two years to approve, and revisiting a K7 image taken with the DA17-70 and processed in Silkypix DS Pro I found that again, the sharpness increases substantially when handled in LR with the lens correction. 'Twas a very pleasant surprise!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sharpening in Photoshop at 17/12/2012 - 15:08
The technique of converting to LAB mode and just sharpening the luminance (black and white) channel is useful for architectural subjects as the colour information is not affected at all, so we end up with an underlying very sharp image with no artefacts in the colour channels. We convert back to RGB before saving for print.
• duplicate the image onto a new layer
• apply the sharpening to the layer (which will include colour artifacts)
• change the layer blend mode from Normal to Luminosity
If you want to visualise it in the same way as Lab you can B&W the top layer before applying sharpening.
Luminosity blend mode is (99.9%) the L channel of the Lab mode.
Of course, one nice feature of this is the ability to fade the layer opacity and/or apply a layer mask to locally apply.
(But for me, all my sharpening is now done in LR)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sharpening in Photoshop at 17/12/2012 - 08:58
The Not Ready marker indicates that it's not got enough data yet. There's also a time value in the EXIF
When using SR you should half press, and wait for the hand icon in the VF before fully depressing the shutter.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Stabilized, Not Ready? at 14/12/2012 - 06:24


Gently resting a finger on the focus ring while autofocusing pretty much resolved the hunting
(Added to that that I generally use centre focus point, with the AF button - and not the half press shutter)
Matt