MattMatic

Joined: 2nd July 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MattMatic
Quote:
Wow... That is a video camera!!!
Well, it would be if you could buy it

Comment by MattMatic posted on Update on the revolutionary RED video camera at 12/05/2007 - 21:33

MattMatic
Chris - no alas (or a benefit depending how you look at it for protecting against people pinching images).
Some of the images are on ePhotozine though in 1000pixel format.
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on pistyll rhaeadr waterfall took this weekend at 11/05/2007 - 21:50

MattMatic
Pete:
http://www.airtightinteractive.com/simpleviewer/
(You can just Google for it )
But you'll need to be a bit web-savvy to set it all up. Big hint: Picassa from Google will create an album automatically with the plugin available for SimpleViewer
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on pistyll rhaeadr waterfall took this weekend at 11/05/2007 - 20:26

MattMatic
Personally, I rather like SimpleViewer - have used it on my home-brew web site ( www.mattmatic.co.uk ) ultrasmall and therefore very fast.
Easy to update as well
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on pistyll rhaeadr waterfall took this weekend at 11/05/2007 - 19:03

MattMatic
Pete,
I have an 8Mb link at work and that site was still slow in my book
Too much "fluff" for my liking.
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on pistyll rhaeadr waterfall took this weekend at 11/05/2007 - 18:44

MattMatic
Pete,
The camera doesn't "only do -2EV"
What's probably happened is you've used evaluative metering (the green one), and tried to use -2EV...

The problem is that the surrounding view is quite dark, and the water is relatively bright. Evaluative metering will often get these imbalanced shots wrong...

You have a couple of solutions that require more advanced control:
1) Use meter exposure lock - easiest thing is to zoom in so the water covers most of the frame, half press and press the AE-L button. A little "star" will show in the viewfinder - you have about a minute to recompose and take the shot.

2) Use fully manual - as per John's suggestion, the easiest thing is to:
a) set ISO100
b) set the shutter speed to some value (about 0.5" is a good start for waterfalls)
c) try different shutter speeds until you get a sensible histogram.

So, yes, these shots are overexposed but you may still be able to rescue them a little...
* Try pulling back the exposure compensation in the RAW convertor - you may have detail left in the highlights
* You can try adjusting the gamma - you can either do this directly if your RAW convertor has it, or open the curves control and grab the middle of the curve and pull down slightly to make a curved ramp. This will lower the midtones and make the colours "richer".

HTH,
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on pistyll rhaeadr waterfall took this weekend at 07/05/2007 - 21:29

MattMatic
Even Ffordes.co.uk (which is never that cheap) has several Z70s going for £69 and that will include a warranty

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax PZ70 - Shutter problems at 08/05/2007 - 12:21

MattMatic
Quote:
Do you thinkt he K10D kit lens can offer sharper images?
They look mis-focussed, not "unsharp".
If you look at the wall by the side of the model, it is in focus at a point either behind or in front of her.

If this was a manual focus lens and you are using the focus-assist - make sure you check the green hexagon in the viewfinder, and not the red viewfinder LED! The red one shows you which sensor has a lock, but isn't accurate for manual focus

(Personally, I always manually select the focus point, usually using the centre point and additionally make use of the AF button on the back and the custom functions to stop the focus-on-half-press.)

Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Bartender Girl Photoshoot - Critiques Please at 07/05/2007 - 21:34

MattMatic
Thanks John & Don
Stressed I am Maybe that's 90% of the problem
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Not Pleased with Final Outcome..Print? at 08/05/2007 - 20:55

MattMatic
Just a personal thought to the original post by Ben...

It's an interesting thing being able to "visualise" what you want. You know I can do this with my work in designing and writing firmware. I can look at a problem, think of several solutions, whittle it down to one or two and draught out a design. Over the process of writing the code I can keep the "whole" in my mind and adjust the design... to this day I don't know how what processes I go through, it just happens intuitively.

But... but, when it comes to imaging I am aware of a huge gap between the execution and final result. It's like trying to jump a chasm. So, I just go "by eye" and "go with the flow" trying to capture images that make me feel something. Then I work on them and hope that this process produces something

There have only been a few cases where I have thought of the end result before producing the image and so have had a clear vision:
http://www.ephotozine.com/u16488/gallery/302173
http://www.ephotozine.com/u16488/gallery/101235
http://www.ephotozine.com/u16488/gallery/52994
(Make sure you put your coffee cups down before viewing )

The rest have been a case of just capturing what I've seen... and maybe having an inkling of what I want to produce while I'm at the scene.


Some tutorial on bridging this gap would be great

Does that make sense??
Matt

Comment by MattMatic posted on Not Pleased with Final Outcome..Print? at 08/05/2007 - 16:00

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo