All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on K20d review on dpreview. at 26/06/2008 - 14:06
The high ISO of the K20D look very appealing, though it's not something I use every day. Additionally, the nearly 2 stops extra dynamic range in the K20D looked an excellent upgrade.
But, having seen all that, I think I'm carrying on with the K10D. It's just saved me seven hundred squid that I don't have
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K20d review on dpreview. at 26/06/2008 - 13:01
You can get small specks of dust inside a lens, especially zoom lenses that can "suck" in air as you extend the lens. But a hair, and those white specks...!
The trouble is, they may view it as unfair wear-and-tear (for example, leaving the lens in a warm damp environment may encourage fungus spores - that's not the manufacturer's fault). So phone them up, talk nicely to them, and ask what they can do first
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on dirt inside the lens at 24/06/2008 - 11:45
The camera will choose what it thinks is the best arrangement. You can always override its choice by using the front wheel (for shutter speed), or rear wheel (for aperture). Press the green button to go back to full-camera choice.
Personally, I use another mode - but I'd suggest you start with that and see how it goes
Indoor shots (especially without flash) can be challenging. If you want to get used to it before trying it out on the kids - borrow of one of their soft toys and practise first. Toys don't get bored When you're comfortable and familiar with the camera you can take more natural shots of the kids - keep them interested and engaged by talking to them and having a laugh!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on shooting indoors at 25/06/2008 - 06:36
spend hours post-processing peoples eye-balls
If you're using Photoshop or Photoshop Elements... just let me know and I'll write up another thread.
The best way to stop RE in the first place is to either (a) get some distance between the lens and flash so there's a greater angle of incidence, or (b) reflect and bounce the flash with an external gun.
I've been playing around with a small home made reflector, and bouncing the light off the ceiling. I've been getting some great shots (Check out the admittedly slightly annoying videos: www.abetterbouncecard.com )
Have fun!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Please Help with Metz 48 AF-1 anybody ??? at 24/06/2008 - 06:42
...especially where it's infuriatingly sluggish response is concerned.
When focussing is eliminated, the pop-up flash is as responsive as any other flash I've used (and I've used many )
However, I'm glad to report that the Metz 48 AF-1 is a vast improvement in this respect, but I'm still wondering if there is any way to avoid the dreaded pre-flash, which is probably a contradiction in terms when discussing P-TTL ?
With the AF360/540 you can switch the flash to "A" or "M" modes (when using the camera in "M" mode)... but that's a different story, and may not be at all possible with the Metz.
[quote]It occurred to me that as the pop-up flash supposedly puts out an infra-red AF assist beam in dark conditions...[/quote[
No it doesn't The pop-up flash fires a burst of real light to get focus assist. None of the external flash units use IR - just visible red light.
...so it can establish how far away the subject matter is...
I am not sure if the Metz will act as a slave to the pop-up flash. The remote flash is performed with a short burst of sequenced light from the pop-up to the slave (and back again). You can't cover anything up!
There is, however, a custom setting in the K10D/20D etc that allows you to choose whether the pop-up contributes to the exposure.
I think you have more than one subject here - (1) focus in low light, (2) remote flash, and maybe some more...
Have you read my sticky note on P-TTL flash?
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Please Help with Metz 48 AF-1 anybody ??? at 23/06/2008 - 05:51
Never been let down yet
But then I still use HDD for keeping my images (3 of them in different places).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on DVD Archival for Photos at 25/06/2008 - 11:04
Hi folks. I currently use elements6 and I am considering upgrading to CS3
If it's because you want better photos, then stick with Elements
If you are missing a particular feature then consider it...
However, I would definitely encourage you to learn all you can about PSE6 before switching. You need to learn about layers, masks, filters etc etc etc. Only when your skills cannot grow any more - then consider CS.
To be honest, when it comes to general photography, there isn't much that Elements can't do.
Some good places to check out:
www.hiddenelements.com
and the tutorials on my website: www.photon.me.uk
That should keep you going for a long time!
If you don't already shoot RAW, then switching to RAW and using a decent convertor (like Silkypix or CaptureOne) will keep you going for even longer!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on adobe elements6 vs adobe photoshop cs3 at 19/06/2008 - 16:29
There's a few folk here who need to get out more
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards, is bigger better? at 26/06/2008 - 13:13
I'm always learning
Comment by MattMatic posted on SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards, is bigger better? at 26/06/2008 - 12:57


Of course it could have just been my total lack of experience in using the camera when its dark
Switch to spot metering, zoom in and point the centre to a face that's lit and press the green button. Then reframe and shoot away. (You may even have to use less than ISO1600 to make this possible!!)
With an image that's substantially black the camera tries to push it so it becomes 18% grey - thus blowing out the highlights and losing all detail.
Might help...
Matt