All Forum Comments
I have the "E" remote - the zoom functions are for the compact film camera
The wired remote is almost certainly going to be a better bet Sometimes with the IR remote the signal isn't "seen" (especially in bright lighting). The wired remote can be easily extended with a cheap 2.5mm stereo headphone lead
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax Infared Remote Controls at 10/12/2008 - 12:45
My last two shots on epz are "studio style" - actually shot outdoors in the evening with a single remote flash and reflector. But it'll give you a small idea of what the K20D is capable of:
"Sweet Nothings" & "Hold Me Close" - both shot at ISO640 and are incredibly detailed.
(As mentioned earlier, it's the lighting that does most of the work )
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Full Frame? at 10/12/2008 - 12:41
The 24-90 is superb. The colour is sublime, and the sharpness excellent. It does suffer from a little CA on the edges of the frame on the K20D - but this is easily and instantly corrected in Silkypix when shooting RAW.
That said... the new 17-70 does look extremely tempting On my 24-90 I often use the 40-70 range, and the 17mm end would be much more useful than 24mm. The 16-45 is also a superb lens. Incredibly sharp and very useful range... but I tend to want 50-90mm range quite a lot (portraits etc). However, the bokeh on the 24-90 is nicer (IMHO).
If I had some spare dosh I'd really like to try out the 17-70mm (but then I'd also rather like the 16-50 DA* and 50-135 DA* ) The joys of Pentax LBA
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Mid-range zoom for K20D at 10/12/2008 - 12:38
The range depends a lot on the battery health in the remote control
(Mine needs replacing)
To be honest, I tend to use the wired remote for macros and tripod shots - has the ability to lock in the "B" mode.
I only ever use the IR remote when doing family pictures that I have to appear in... and that's not many
Zoom functions, of course, don't work - you need fingers to move the zoom lens! (I have one that was for an old Pentax film camera that had zoom.)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax Infared Remote Controls at 10/12/2008 - 09:51
I do....."It would be quicker to train an ape!"
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DA ED at 09/12/2008 - 17:33
Another Can of Worms Opened
Comment by MattMatic posted on Full Frame? at 09/12/2008 - 17:31
(It would probably be quicker to train a monkey though - assuming you remember Fawlty Tower's lines )
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DA ED at 09/12/2008 - 17:01
Answer#1 - Utter tosh
You should see what I've done with the old *ist-D in a studio-style environment You can bet that my results with the K10D were better still, and the K20D results are drop dead gorgeous
Studio photography requires good lighting, not full frame
Myth#2 - My images will be better with a FF camera.
Answer#2 - If you can't take good photos with an APS-C dSLR then your photos on a FF will be disappointing too
Having the weight of a FF camera and lenses may make you look more professional. It's true, I've seen horrible photos taken on FF (both from an artistic viewpoint and from a technical one).
Bottom line - learn to use what you have
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Full Frame? at 09/12/2008 - 16:57
It's a lovely compact lens with excellent bokeh:
"Bug's Eye View" & Snowdrops were both taken with it on the K10D.
Might have to take it for another run...
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pentax 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DA ED at 09/12/2008 - 11:48


phpBB is one of the easiest for general forums
You can tweak the style of phpBB fairly easily (assuming you understand PHP code!!)
Also, hosting services (like PowWeb that we use) already have "one-click" installations for phpBB and other such forums.
As stated, this forum is custom written (see www.ephotozine.com for the sister site... running on the same coding style)
Matt