All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Who does your printing? at 09/02/2010 - 17:25
Look under "Switching characteristics" and 'forced commutation'
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on X sync socket problem at 05/02/2010 - 15:12
You know, the more I read this, the more I'm confused
Think I'll have to go and experiment!
EDIT: and here http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/camera-studio-accessories/58723-wireless-cont...
what's contrast control?
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Contrast Control numbers at 05/02/2010 - 12:28
However, you may find your subject just blinks In fact, I have tried taking flash photos of people who blink immediately after the P-TTL - so fast they have their eyes nearly closed for the main flash!
Personally I don't bother with red eye reduction on the camera. My choice is:
1) As Kris says, use bounced or off camera flash
2) Just take the shot and de-red-eye in Photoshop
3) Don't use flash at all
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on red eye !? at 04/02/2010 - 14:29
I sliced it out for you using Topaz Lab's ReMask v2
Took a couple of minutes, including adjusting the resulting mask to cope with the transparency of the droplets. The mask could do with some tweaking - but there's only so much I can do at this low resolution.
(You can get demo versions of the plugins from Topaz... do a Google before buying as they have several discount codes going on )

Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Background Correction at 03/02/2010 - 14:21
(Not sure, but I think reversing the connections on the PC sync lead sorted it out. Personally, I would use a volt-meter to check the trigger voltage on the studio lights and check that the centre pin is positive with respect to the outer shield of the PC sync lead.)
Can anyone remember exactly?
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on X sync socket problem at 03/02/2010 - 09:09
However, its editing capabilities are geared towards web-graphics at the moment. I found it was ok for editing large TIFFs, but struggled a bit with what I needed to do.
If you want to use the Apple Composer filters etc then it's great. However, there's no support for Photoshop plugins (IIRC), and I have a fair stack of those. Trouble is, I've been using the full Photoshop for too long
If I was going for a budget package, then probably Elements would be it. But Pixelmator is definitely a great tool (and there are some excellent tutorials on their web site). I'm sure it'll grow... given time.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Pixelmator at 29/01/2010 - 09:05
It's not Argyll that's 'at fault', but the type of profile you choose
A "Matrix" profile will not compensate for a poor black point on the display.
Using a "cLUT" colour look up table type profile will work wonders, but takes longer to produce.
Do also note that not all software can handle cLUT profiles. Some fall back to treating them like a Matrix profile. So your mileage may vary depending on the app you are using.
dispcalGUI is a very nice way to wrap everything up. It also includes the necessary startup process to load the profile on Windows etc
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Monitor calibration at 28/01/2010 - 15:28
Please re-read the sentence
It is the distance scale that will be incorrect, not the exposure.
Of course, if the flash says the maximum distance is 4m, your subject is at 3m and you are using a Stofen then you'll probably get an underexposed shot because the flash won't have the power to 'throw' the light that far
Does that make more sense? (Will send the e-book when I get home!)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Digital SLR and P-TTL flash guide at 28/01/2010 - 13:02


Calibrated monitor, calibrated printer profile from ProAM and the colour is accurate every time
(You really do need full Photoshop to use this though. It is possible in Elements, but pretty tricky )
Matt