All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on i need so much help at 25/09/2007 - 10:39
Apparently an M lens has just bare metal (can someone confirm this?), so all the contacts will short.
This problem sounds identical to an issue (documented in these forums) I had some time ago with a set of Jessops extension tubes. Although they were 'A' series compatible, they had only 6 or 7 contacts. The *istDS body I had at the time had one more contact than the tubes. The remaining contact surface was painted (insulated) and I had to scrape some of the paint off of these tubes to get the DS to function. Others here have employed the same remedy to good effect.
I think the same seems to be true of some/all screw lenses. Your aluminium foil idea would seem to work OK, the alternative would be to remove the paint from the body mounting surface of the lens. If its actually anadized, rather than painted, that might be a problem.
Comment by Mannesty posted on M42 Adapter, help! at 25/09/2007 - 20:34
The weight issue occured to me just after I clicked 'submit'.
Regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on Everest Extreme Expedition at 23/09/2007 - 11:31
Comment by Mannesty posted on Everest Extreme Expedition at 21/09/2007 - 20:23
K10D + Grip
FA 50 1:1.4 (on top of the flash)
DA 12-24mm (Left Rear)
DA* 16-50mm (Left Front or on the camera)
DA* 50-135mm (Left Front or on the camera)
AF540FGZ Flash (Right hand side)
8 x AA Eneloop batteries (spares for the flash)
But there is a problem in that I can't get the DA 12-24mm in the side pocket with it's hood. Instead, the 12-24 and the 16-50 share the hood from the 10-24 (Same fitting, slightly shorter/wider than the 16-50's hood). No problems so far using the wrong hood on the 16-50.
This combination ensures that whichever lens is on the camera, I have room to store all of the others. When I use the 50mm, I keep the camera out of the bag and whichever lens was on it, goes in the camera's space inside the bag.
I'd have room for a 2x'ish teleconverter in the top too but I don't yet have a decent enough one.
Comment by Mannesty posted on The Slingshot Bags at 15/10/2007 - 18:50
Could be that they have been breaking kits (more demand for K10D body only ) and are now selling off surplus kit lens.
SRS have this lens listed for £39
I am rather new to this LBA. I already have this lens, but I would like a little more reach, so is it likely that there could be a surplus of, say, 50-200 in the near future?
Richard
I bought the Samsung 50-200mm brand new and boxed for £50 + carriage and it is a superb performer.
Comment by Mannesty posted on What am I missing DA18-55? at 20/09/2007 - 23:05
So now I have a reasonably lightweight kit (*istD + grip + 18-55 + 50-200 + AF360FGZ) to keep in the car.
Sorted.
Thanks for the link Richard.
Comment by Mannesty posted on What am I missing DA18-55? at 20/09/2007 - 15:40
Bargain, go for it if you need one.
Comment by Mannesty posted on What am I missing DA18-55? at 20/09/2007 - 15:23
It looked a tad bigger in the viewfinder.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Advice for complete novice at 21/09/2007 - 12:36
Comment by Mannesty posted on A Study in Blue at 16/09/2007 - 18:38


We can probably help you but you do need to answer any questions we ask. Like "exactly which type of battery areyou using?" which has been asked at least twice, and remains unanswered..
Regards,