All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Test kit v 1.7 smc 50 mm at 24/06/2008 - 20:03
If you want to see an amazing piece of technology where wheelchairs are concerned, go on "You Tube" and search "iBot 4000". You'll be amazed!!!
I want one, and I don't even need one . . . yet! ! !
Comment by Mannesty posted on shooting indoors at 28/06/2008 - 12:13
Thanks for the education.
Kind regards and good luck with your camera,
Comment by Mannesty posted on shooting indoors at 25/06/2008 - 09:01
Comment by Mannesty posted on shooting indoors at 24/06/2008 - 23:55
shots of the kids mainly
i forgot about the exposure bracketing i know i must practice a bit more with different types of photography my landscapes and macro i feel comfortable with having practised loads but i allways left photos of the kids to the wife mainly thanks once again iceblinker..
If you'd used capital letters to begin each sentence it might have helped.
Most of us here go to a lot of trouble to help new Pentax users to become better Pentax users. It helps when those seeking advice take the trouble to write carefully, at least carefully enough that we don't spend more time than is necessary to understand the problem.
Thanks & regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on shooting indoors at 24/06/2008 - 15:29
so, in essence if we have a zoom lens with a range of 55-250 (say?) then the max aperature at 55 is f4 whilst at 250 it's f5.6 (yes?)
Comment by Mannesty posted on zoom lenses at 24/06/2008 - 07:52
If you set your camera to Av and set the widest aperture with the zoom at the short end of its range, then zoom in (towards the long end), you'll notice the aperture setting on the camera will change.
In practical terms, this is only really an issue when using manual shutter and aperture settings. If you set the exposure correctly for the short end, and then zoom in, your image will be under-exposed.
A zoom lens expressed as a single f number is known as a constant aperture zoom lens and the aperture remains as set for the entire zoom range.
EG: Pentax DA* 16-50mm 1:2.8
Comment by Mannesty posted on zoom lenses at 24/06/2008 - 07:22
OK, the pic. The leaf at front left appears to have moved during exposure. Was it windy?
The cicada is not actually in focus. A golden rule (which can be broken) is to get the eye(s) in focus.
Your plane of focus seems to be a bit short, cutting across its right front leg. The wings too are out of focus.
You might have got a better shot if you'd used a diffused flash to illuminate it, and freeze the action of the wind (if it was windy). You could then have used a smaller aperture to increase the depth of field a little.
Hope that helps.
The 1.7 was often sold as a kit lens back in the film days and isn't as glamourous (or fast) as its 1.4 sibling, however, 1.7 is still very quick compared to your current lenses and the optical (and build) qualities are exceptional - a real step up from what you've used thus far. The focal length makes it great for portraits and the ability to shoot with razor-thin depths of field and in low light (without flash) will be a real eye-opener.
:
So..is this an f1.2 lens, or am I being to simplistic jumping to that conclusion?
If it is, is this any good? I just put it on my digital camera and it works well, so either way..it is another lens
Comment by Mannesty posted on Is this... at 24/06/2008 - 20:06
I love it. Thanks for sharing it.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Grey Heron - Suspended at 23/06/2008 - 17:49


Seriously, 2 shots does not a test make.
If you were to repeat your test at all apertures common to both lenses, I'm sure you'd see a difference at the extremes of aperture.
Then you'd apreciate the additional low light capabilities of the 50/1.7 I think.