All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Please Help with Metz 48 AF-1 anybody ??? at 24/06/2008 - 06:43
The common solution to this is to use an external flash mounted on the hot shoe to increase the angle, but even that doesn't completely eliminate the problem in all circumstances.
By far the best portable solution is to mount the flash an a flash grip such that the flash head is above, and to the side of, the camera lens.
My own preference is to use a modified Pentax Hot Shoe Grip, either with the necessary cables connecting flash to camera, or set the camera to a wireless controller and trigger the now remote flash from it. It works for me.
I think you m ay have learned a lot from this thread in a very short space of time. Good luck.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Please Help with Metz 48 AF-1 anybody ??? at 24/06/2008 - 06:25
If I've understood things correctly, the primary purpose of wireless flash operation is to be able to trigger external flashguns that are mounted somewhere off-camera.
This is in order to avoid the harsh & unflattering lighting that usually results from photographing subjects head-on with a flashgun.
I have read somewhere that the Metz 48 AF-1 can only act as a Slave in wireless mode.
If the pop-up flash of the K10D IS the wireless mode, is there ANY way in which it can trigger the Metz 48 AF-1 (mounted on the hot-shoe of my K10D) WITHOUT the pop-up flash actually firing, or does it HAVE to flash in order to trigger the Metz ?
The wireless master or controller flash, be it an expensive hot shoe mounted flash or the built-in pop-up uses a sequence of light pulses to 'talk' to the remote flash/flashes.
Your camera manual expressly forbids the use of a hotshoe mounted flash and the built-in flash together (check the note at the bottom of page 180 of the PDF manual). You must use only one. I doubt that the popup flash would fully extend anyway. To put it more simply, if you use the popup, don't fit another flash to the hotshoe. Set it up as a remote slave instead.
You can (depending on the capabilities of your external flash) use the popup as a trigger for a dumb slave if you can manually set the dumb slave flash output power to less than 50% . The dumb slave will then flash on both the pre-flash and the main flash from the popup, but you must then use totally manual everything to achieve consistant results.
I'm guessing that if the built-in flash were left in the "up" position with the Metz 48 AF-1 mounted on the K10D's hot-shoe, the pop-up flash would undoubtedly interfere with the normal operation of the Metz 48 AF-1 ?
Secondly, if employing an advanced flashgun such as the Metz 58 AF-1 which is equipped with a forward facing 'secondary' reflector, could one use this to highlight the subjects eyes slightly, whilst using the main reflector in one of it's 'bounce' modes ? I assume that you can't achieve the same sort of thing by using a combination of the K10D's pop-up flash in conjunction the Metz 48 AF-1 ?
As mentioned previously, I've found that the speed of P-TTL operation is greatly improved when relying solely upon the Metz 48 AF-1 for illumination, rather than the sluggish response of the pop-up flash. Has anyone else noticed this anomaly ?
Finally, have you checked that your flash has the latest firmware? If not, check it, and update it if necessary.
Really finally, if your K10D is at firmware version 1.0, update it. That first version didn't support wireless flash and I don't think there is any reference to wireless flash in the original manual. The updated manual pages are available with the firmware updates.
Hope that explains a bit for you.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Please Help with Metz 48 AF-1 anybody ??? at 23/06/2008 - 14:41
ok cheers hefty , would anyone know out of port lympne and howletts which is the best for photographing tigers and gorillas?
Comment by Mannesty posted on K10d Mulitple Exposure Mode at 24/06/2008 - 07:11
But who is that beautiful woman
Martin.
Comment by Mannesty posted on WOW - just got my DA* 50-135 at 10/07/2008 - 22:31
You really do know all there is to know about the world, the universe, and everything
Cheers,
Comment by Mannesty posted on SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards, is bigger better? at 26/06/2008 - 12:11
There are a few little nuances as to whether kilo means 1000 or 1024 (and kiB/kib, Gib/GiB &c). But please remember the basics of b or B, m or M
1MB = 1024KB
It follows the binary progression since a bit of data can have one of two states, 0 or 1 (usually). Let's not confuse the issue with tristate devices.
Hence: 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 etc
Comment by Mannesty posted on SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards, is bigger better? at 26/06/2008 - 10:58
Yes, sorry, brain fade...
on minimum aperture the photo was over exposed untill the 2 sec delay was initiated then the exposure was correct again.
This problem is most often caused by oily blades but if your inspection shows them to be perfectly clean, the problem is elswhere in the mechanism.
My advice:-
1: Don't attempt to fix it yourself unless you are prepared to potentially trash the lens.
2: Live with the use of the delay unless you really want to keep these lenses for a long time.
3: Send the lens/lenses away for service/repair. You could try either www.asahiphoto.co.uk or www.harrowtechnical.co.uk if you are based in the UK.
Good luck & regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on Exposure problems using my old vivitar lenses on my K10 at 23/06/2008 - 14:21
I've just done a quick test. Took a picture of the garden with my vivitar set at full apature - perfect
stopped down to minimum, pressed green button, shot again, - under exposed
switched 2 sec delay on, everything else same - perfect again
I think this proves it's an apature fault, but at least I have a work around now by using the delay function.
If you meant over exposed, then there would seem to be an issue somewhere.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Exposure problems using my old vivitar lenses on my K10 at 20/06/2008 - 21:10
Thanks Pete,
could be, but I've never had the lenses in bits. As far as I know they are working the same as they have ever done. Having said that, they haven't been used for a few years !!!
I have been 'flicking' the iris to see if Icould loosen it up a bit...
Inspect both sides of the iris. If it looks at all wet, you have oil on your blades and they'll need a service to fix the problem.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Exposure problems using my old vivitar lenses on my K10 at 18/06/2008 - 22:37


I thought I'd read that when using the 'bounce' technique, the pull-out wide angle diffuser throws out/deflects a slight amount of light in the forward direction, which also serves to highlight people's eyes ?
To use it, extend the catchlight panel, tilt the flash head vertical and try it. You can throw a bit more light forward by gradually tilting the flash head back towards the subject. This setup will give you bounced flash (assuming you are indoors) and catchlights from the reflector. If that's not enough, maybe you should consider the metz 58 AF-1 flash instead which has a second flash tube for fill-in flash (secondary reflector as you called it).
Checkout the spec here. Metz callls it an extendible reflector card (2nd image from top on the right).