Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
If you got it seriously cheap, you have a bargain there. Well done.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Whats wrong with this lens? at 28/04/2013 - 17:31

Mannesty
If you had not mentioned Infrared anywhere, I would have said that they were B&W images.

EG: Most IR shots of grass, trees, etc shows the greens as white.

Your images, good though they are, don't quite portray that.

PS: The music you've used is probably copyrighted.

Comment by Mannesty posted on digitally produced infrared at 28/04/2013 - 15:01

Mannesty
Well I'm surprised that you can't see what's wrong with it, it's plainly obvious . . .




. . . nothing.




May we know which lens it is? It may be one that has known issues that somebody might no of.

Is it maybe a zoom that suffers from barrel creep, that is, it changes focus when pointed up or down?

Does it rattle when you shake it?

Comment by Mannesty posted on Whats wrong with this lens? at 28/04/2013 - 14:53

Mannesty
johnwhit wrote:
Are we talking about this one:

link

TIA,

John
Yes, that's the one I have, and another on its way.

Comment by Mannesty posted on the cheaper Pentax 540 battery pack... at 28/04/2013 - 10:50

Mannesty
The Pentax power packs are bigger because they use C cells but for me, the use of AA's is more convenient.

Comment by Mannesty posted on the cheaper Pentax 540 battery pack... at 28/04/2013 - 10:23

Mannesty
This all makes me think the the sooner all DSLR's go mirrorless, the better.

Surely the inaccuracy of the actual point of focus is down to the mechanical tolerances of the mirror adjustment and placement of the focus sensors.

So with no mirror and the focusing being done by the image sensor should eliminate some of these issues.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Lens calibration - Focus Tune software at 28/04/2013 - 10:00

Mannesty
McBrian wrote:
JAK wrote:

The software will not tell you what setting you need to enter into the camera to put the AF right, you'll still need to experiment to get it correct.
Have you watched the video or am I missing/missunderstanding something? my understanding is this is precisely what the software does tell you.
You have it right Brian, by checking each lens at each possible adjustment, the software eventually determines which setting gives the best focus accuracy at the chosen focus point.

McBrian wrote:

If you ware varifocal glasses as I do you my realise that something like this could be very useful
I do. Aren't they a pain when you need to look through a viewfinder.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Lens calibration - Focus Tune software at 27/04/2013 - 22:32

Mannesty
tyronet2000 wrote:
I usually just wait for another person to tell me " it's a bit soft "
That's called colaboration Stan, not calibration.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Lens calibration - Focus Tune software at 27/04/2013 - 13:02

Mannesty
andrewk wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="JohnX"]I guess folks can look up the corresponding figures in their K5 and K5II manuals.
Out of curiosity, I did.

The K-5 is EV-1 to 18, the K-5 II is EV-3 to 18, but I can find no reference to aperture that this refers to.

All I know is that the K-5 II is awesome at focusing in very low light with a f2.8 lens.

Comment by Mannesty posted on K5II - centre focus point - AF at f2.8 - What? at 27/04/2013 - 10:03

Mannesty
DaveHolmes wrote:
When using these test charts do you focus from the minimum focus distance of the lens ...
You now, once you download stuff, it's good to read it

The instructions say "minimum focus distance, then back a bit".

Comment by Mannesty posted on AF Calibration charts at 26/04/2013 - 17:42

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo