All Forum Comments
The software? Vuescan. Simples.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Negative scanner - any ideas? at 05/09/2010 - 22:32
32Gb cards are not exactly common so it's highly likely that you have a genuine card that is not compatible with your camera.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Recover Photos from corrupted SD card at 05/09/2010 - 22:29
Comment by Mannesty posted on Venturing into the World of primes at 05/09/2010 - 22:21
I notice that you also have a K10D. If you also have extension tubes, perhaps you could try a lens and see if it's the same for you.
BTW: This behaviour was only really evident when I passed my right arm over my left shoulder and then between my legs before reaching for the shutter button. Let us know how you get on with your test.
Comment by Mannesty posted on K20D oddity at 05/09/2010 - 22:11
I use R-Studio which I think offers a free version for emergency recovery. Just google for it.
For the future though, I highly recommend buying smaller cards, and more of them. If this were to happen again, you wouldn't lose so many images.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Recover Photos from corrupted SD card at 05/09/2010 - 17:20
The setup:-
K20D + 3 x Kenko extension tubes + DA* 300mm lens
The objective:-
I wanted to see if I could get similar results with the above setup as I was getting with the Sigma 180mm Macro (no tubes).
The problem:-
When reviewing the few images I took I used the rear e-dial to magnify the image, then I used the 4 way controller to pan the magnified image.
The 4 way controller would not scroll the image, I had to press and release the controller to pan the image.
If I removed the tubes and lens, the image panned fine. If I refitted the lens with no tubes, the image panned fine. I refitted the tubes and it wouldn't pan.
Anybody else noticed this behaviour with perhaps manual lenses?
Comment by Mannesty posted on K20D oddity at 05/09/2010 - 00:29
I'd rather just have a plain LX to be honest, these special editions don't add any extra features IIRC?
Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax LX 24K GOLD SPECIAL VERSION 50mm f/1.2 at 04/09/2010 - 14:01
One of our members, Kim Coxon, has this model, which I personally prefer.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax LX 24K GOLD SPECIAL VERSION 50mm f/1.2 at 04/09/2010 - 12:12
1. Pentax 100mm Macro, WR version if possible.
2. K7 Body plus 12-24mm, 16-45mm, 55mm, 55-300mm.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Dream collection at 04/09/2010 - 09:18


Do you have a note of all the serial numbers? If so, perhaps post them on as many Canon fora for all to see, also lookout on eBay and other likely places for them if they had any identifying marks.
Chances are though, they'll be sold in a pub somewhere.
For the future, think about locking your camera bag inside a Pacsafe.