All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Newbie question about raw format at 11/09/2010 - 16:26
I answered 'never'
Comment by Mannesty posted on How often do you clean your contacts? at 11/09/2010 - 16:17
Possible you removed some grease that was supposed to be there?
I'd think the weather seals would've kept the contacts clean......
Comment by Mannesty posted on How often do you clean your contacts? at 11/09/2010 - 16:16
I was shooting the start of the 'Moors and Christians' fiesta in Murcia, Spain. Amidst other 'togs with a range of kit including a Fuji Finepix, Canons, and some Nikon big guns. One guy had a Canon 1DS MK? with a lens on it that looked like a 5 gallon oil drum, geez it was huge.
Anyway, I was using an AF540FGZ flash with Sto-Fen Omnibounce and on several occasions during the latter part of the evening the shutter absolutely refused to fire occasionally (an issue I have had before I hasten to add). When it did, the shutter speed was so slow that I got blurred images, but the exposure was OK thanks to P-TTL.
Now I'm not used to, and have no time for, kit that doesn't do what I want it to, when I want it to (all batteries were charged before leaving for the event).
Then it occured to me, I haven't cleaned anything except sensors for a while and I did change lenses a couple of times during the evening, and the problem only occured after the last lens change.
Today I applied a few drops of WD40 to a lint free cloth and began cleaning the camera and lens mounts. I was stunned, amazed, and horrified (all at the same time) at the amount of grey metallic crud that appeared on my cleaning cloth.
I then went on to clean all my lenses and both cameras and all of my flash hot shoe mounts. I even cleaned the two SDM power contacts inside the bodies and on all my SDM lenses. All produced some dirt in varying degrees.
I haven't really got to the bottom of why the shutter din't fire, but I'm guessing this dirt had something to do with it.
So, how often do you clean yours. My answer is, When I suspect a problem. In last nights case, it was too late and I missed a few good shots.
Comment by Mannesty posted on How often do you clean your contacts? at 11/09/2010 - 15:46
Thanks, I nearly castrated myself putting a reflector back in its bag this morning.
Comment by Mannesty posted on light tent recommendation please at 11/09/2010 - 15:26
I have one and it's superb. Mine came with red, black, blue, and white back cloths, just about all you need really.
Comment by Mannesty posted on light tent recommendation please at 11/09/2010 - 14:54
Give it a go, edit a raw image that has the wrong white balance and change it to what it should have been. You'll see what I mean.
The RAW image is just that, data taken straight from the sensor. The image file also stores whatever other settings you may have applied, like WB, and re-applies them after importing into your chosen RAW editor where you can change things if you got it wrong at capture time.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Newbie question about raw format at 11/09/2010 - 14:46
I would love to see something from Pentax in the range of 400/500 or even 600mm . . .
Comment by Mannesty posted on What primes would we like to see? at 11/09/2010 - 14:31
Now that the 645 will be available . . .
Comment by Mannesty posted on Medium Format 645D at 11/09/2010 - 14:26
Have a great day Chris.
Comment by Mannesty posted on SRS Open Day - 9th October at 11/09/2010 - 13:44


Thanks Manesty and RR for your replies. If I understand you correctly, when I modify the settings in Pentax Digital Camera Utility (PDCU) on a raw image, the modifications are made on the original "unmodified" image. If I do the same on a jpeg I'll be modifying an already "modified" image.
Then, if you export/save that image as a JPG, your changes are incorporated into it before the export in much the same way as shooting JPG in the first place.
The main difference is, when you shoot raw, you have much more latitude for changes afterwards.
That said, some here shoot JPG all the time with no issues, but they may have never got the WB wrong (or at least will admit to it).