Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
puma wrote:
I Only want £2.1 million for this



Comment Image
Do you take Paypal?

Comment by Mannesty posted on The world's most expensive photograph at 11/11/2011 - 23:09

Mannesty
davidrobinson wrote:
davex wrote:
Quote:
Problem is, if I'm not happy with it I will not be able to buy another
At it`s current price you will not get anywhere near 500mm with any other option, where are you based? if anywhere near Chester am happy to let you have a play with mine.

In test`s I have tried the lens OS is a good as my K5 SR.
I know some folks may shout at this, but TBH I frequently leave them both on, does not seem to make any difference, have not found any observable evidence that they may cancel each other out, as alleged by others.

Hi Dave
Thanks for the offer but I live in Lincolnshire so a bit of a long trip to try your lens. However the Lincoln branch will let me try a Canon/Nikon version on one of their cameras so I may take them up on the offer. They say they will match Ffords http://www.ffordes.com/product/10072316352212
price for as long as Sigma have stocks at the new low price.
Thanks again for the kind offer
David



Davex.
It's a superb lens, and I may be guilty of evangelism here, but, it's a bit cheaper (OK, only 0.99p) from SRS and you get free postage if you quote your PU user name when you order. If you have any problems with it, their after-sales service is second to none.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Long Lens at 10/11/2011 - 18:18

Mannesty
ChrisA wrote:
Exif Viewer isn't compatible with FF8 yet, according to the add-on compatibility report. So I'll be holding off for a bit.
There is an excellent EXIF viewer plugin for Chrome. You just move your mouse pointer over an image and it displays the basics in the photo itself.

I still prefer FF overall though.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Firefox 8 out at 10/11/2011 - 17:09

Mannesty
Sounds like a warranty repair or replacement to me. I would think it's quite easily repairable but not a DIY job that I'd like to tackle.

Best advice, talk to your supplier.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Broke my 60-250 at 10/11/2011 - 16:31

Mannesty
I've never checked mine, that'll give me something to do tonight while my wife is out dancing. Auto horizon correction seems to work OK though.

There's certainly no mention that I can find of electronic level calibration in the K5 manual.

I have a HTC phone, and the level in that can be calibrated. You just lay the phone flat, and hit calibrate. Pentax ought to be able to do something similar.

Comment by Mannesty posted on K-5 electronic level at 10/11/2011 - 16:01

Mannesty
Well my hopes have been realized and Pentax have agreed to replace my AF160FC, so now I have nothing at all to moan about.

My dealer has sorted out all and every issue for me by replacing my two duff DA* 16-50mm lenses that suffered early life failure (early batch too), and my duff AF160FC flash which will be with me next week.

Reason enough to choose a reputable, reliable, and customer-centric dealer I think.

Who's my dealer? SRS of course.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax woes, tell us about yours. at 10/11/2011 - 14:28

Mannesty
What surprises me is that the link in the OP is still active after more than a year. I'm not really surprised that it hasn't sold yet though.

Comment by Mannesty posted on K1000 on ebay at 10/11/2011 - 08:22

Mannesty
Have you tried Picturenaut, it's free.

Photomatix integrates to Lightroom. Free to try, but costs if you want to remove the trial watermark.

Comment by Mannesty posted on H D R at 09/11/2011 - 22:04

Mannesty
johnriley wrote:
What an incredibly negative thread title....
Well, you could view it as negative as some others have, but it's just a title. Did you read my post?

I listed some of the very few issues I've had. All have been resolved, or are in the process of being resolved. I'd call that quite positive.

My choice of title was deliberate. I'd hoped to provoke some topical discussion and apart from a few humerous diversions, it largely succeeded.

I fully expected that most contributers to this thread would actually be happy with their Pentax kit and with the eventual resolution of any problems they'd had. I know I am.

It's annoying and sometimes downright inconvenient when a camera fails, and somebody's well known law says that "if anything can go wrong, it will". IMHO, good after sales service is what keeps us happy with our Pentax kit.

I'm sure we all accept that whatever piece of sophisticated equipment you care to name, irrespective of the maker, it will have it's problems for some consumers. How those problems are fixed is what's important to me.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax woes, tell us about yours. at 08/11/2011 - 21:50

Mannesty
My experience of owning Pentax DSLR's has, on the whole, been a good one. I have had a couple of nasties that have necessitated the return of some gear due to them failing in their early life.

My AF160FC flash has been returned for repair/replacement for the second time in 2 years. It fails to fully charge. I'm hoping it will be replaced by Pentax this time, rather than be repaired again.

My first two DA* 16-50mm lenses failed with focussing issues. My third lens is perfect.

I'm very glad I chose to buy from a reputable Pro Dealer without whom I would probably have had a lot more hassle getting the items replaced. It's nice to feel 'special', and my dealer makes me feel like a valued customer to the point that I will not buy Pentax gear, or anything else they sell, from anywhere else.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax woes, tell us about yours. at 08/11/2011 - 17:32

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo