All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Negative Scaning at 13/11/2011 - 14:07
Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax returner after a year with Canon at 13/11/2011 - 12:34
I use a Minolta Dimage Scan Dual IV too but with the OEM software, ...
Comment by Mannesty posted on Negative Scaning at 13/11/2011 - 12:03
What are the best five lenses?
Comment by Mannesty posted on Is this really what PUP is for? at 13/11/2011 - 11:16
It's just a shame my 20-40 year old negatives are not in a good state.
My father was custodian of them for some years, and kept them in a damp garage.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Negative Scaning at 13/11/2011 - 11:11
Yes, and you're welcome to be members of both, so no need to feel like naughty boys and girls.
Have you not yet twigged that more and more people are exploring other forums, and some eventually leave here altogether.
Perhaps the team needs to ask themselves why, and start making some changes for the better.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Is this really what PUP is for? at 13/11/2011 - 11:07
Comment by Mannesty posted on Negative Scaning at 12/11/2011 - 22:13
I don't frequent the other forum much,. . . what appears to be a lot less censorship.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Is this really what PUP is for? at 12/11/2011 - 14:44
Whilst the hook is "We show the Top 5 Best Pentax Lenses for Pentax Digital SLRs". it's a totally erroneous and misleading statement. Those 'Best 5' are taken only from the lenses reviewed by PU.
Many of the DA* lenses were never reviewed by PU, or if they were, they weren't included in the list from which these 'Best 5' were selected.
A pretty meaningless attempt to pad out the advertising space on the right of my screen.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Is this really what PUP is for? at 12/11/2011 - 14:18
The images in the video are superb, so what's missing?
An advert, about you. Showing your name is good, a little bit of text at the end explaining what you do and an email and/or a web site address might be better.
Or, just add a text description below the video. As it stands, it's not a very good advert. Very good images? Yes, but that's not enough.
End your advert with a 'Call to action' like, "Visit my web site at http://www.swilsonphotography.foliopic.com/ to see more of my work and the photographic services I provide". Or something like that.
The point is, if you ask viewers to do something and provide the links for them to do it, they may visit your web site and you may get some business from them. If you don't, they probably won't look any further.
Oh, and many people find music on web sites irritating. I know I do. You could add the ability to turn it off, or take it off all together. You're supposed to be advertising your images and services, so why distract people from that by playing music that most people will not want to hear.
Hope that helps.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Do you think UTube is good adverting? at 12/11/2011 - 07:49


If you have Vuescan it might be worth installing the original Minolta software and see what happens, I'd be interested to know the result.