All Forum Comments
Comment by kingfisher posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 22/08/2011 - 20:57
Some would argue you are not getting more for your money by going that route.
Quality not quantity and all that
I've never bought a 'superzoom'. I see it as getting less for my money, and is exactly why I'd never buy a DA 18-135.
If you want a high quality prime you can get an MF Pentax 50/1.7 for a decent price.
In fact you can get an AF Pentax FA 50/1.4 for about £200
Comment by kingfisher posted on An open Letter to Ricoh at 19/08/2011 - 08:41
Comment by kingfisher posted on FS: K20D, Katzeye, Grip, O-ME53 magnifier, Charger at 19/08/2011 - 08:32
Under £300 for a 300mm * lens is ludicrous especially when
people are criticising Pentax for not making long glass.
Comment by kingfisher posted on FS: Pentax M*300/4 at 18/08/2011 - 20:03
Comment by kingfisher posted on Pentax fa 1.7 50mm at 18/08/2011 - 19:56
Comment by kingfisher posted on Pentax-K 35 mm 3.5 very sharp at 18/08/2011 - 11:18
Comment by kingfisher posted on FS: K20D, Katzeye, Grip, O-ME53 magnifier, Charger at 18/08/2011 - 07:06
Comment by kingfisher posted on Pentax-K 35 mm 3.5 very sharp at 18/08/2011 - 07:05
Hi, that's fair enough that you chose to end the listing, but in future you should really plan on leaving things for a longer time to sell. The forum is not ebay - just because you put something up does not mean it will sell within a week. However, if you have some patience, most good items will sell at a fair price eventually!
Comment by kingfisher posted on FS: Pentax M*300/4 at 18/08/2011 - 07:03
So if the M* is supposedly worth in the region of £300 whats that estimated value of the A*300?
Comment by kingfisher posted on FS: Pentax M*300/4 at 18/08/2011 - 07:00
That lens (K35mmf3.5) came out very poorly in this test:
http://erphotoreview.com/wordpress/?p=729
The latest 35mm f/2.4 is much better