All Forum Comments
Comment by Kimbo posted on Newbie seeks advice about a Pentax SF7 at 24/01/2006 - 17:46
Is this because they're bad quality?
Comment by Kimbo posted on Centon lenses at 06/09/2004 - 16:44
I used to have a Rikenon 35-70 that was pretty good but I can't say that the focussing was as crisp and positive as Pentax or indeed Tamron.
For £10.50 however, I think you've got an excellent buy!
Comment by Kimbo posted on Ricoh Rikenon Lenses at 21/10/2004 - 11:16
I've no doubt the Sigma lens is a fine optic but the original Pentax FA 28-105 is superb, it features the auto zoom capabilities that so many critics insist on dismissing as gimmicks and a pointless waste of battery power.
In truth, these features are not only useful but also fun - which was the whole point of the Z series in the first place and auto-zoom can always be disabled when not required.
As an overall package, I think the Z1-P was/is brilliant and quite unique (only the Minolta Xi range came close and they were no where near as user friendly).
Comment by Kimbo posted on Advice desperately required... wedding imminent! at 06/09/2004 - 11:20
You could use the built in meter on one of your other cameras but the incident readings from a seperate meter would be better.
If you do go ahead with the shoot, use a number of cameras and films and fire off as many shots as you can (enlist help if poss.) and that way, you should get a substantial number of good results.
The lighting is always tricky, the groom typically wears a dark suit, the bride in a light if not white dress and you really must get the skin tones just right while focussing on the eyes - you're a braver man than me!
Oh and don't forget to plan the photo sites by checking out the location before the 'big day'.
Good Luck
Comment by Kimbo posted on Advice desperately required... wedding imminent! at 04/09/2004 - 23:13
You could well be right, after all isn't that what business is all about?
Unfortunately, we the buying public, are all too often taken in by the hype.
It's kind of like the hype surrounding the APS format a few years ago, they tried really hard to convince us that we needed to switch because our cameras were too big and heavy, loading and unloading 35mm was far to tricky for us incompetant fools..........oh, and we really really desperately needed to switch between format sizes too!
Don't get me wrong, APS is great (as were the 110 and 126 cartridge films of the '70s) - chooses not to mention the Kodak disc system oops
The point is, we now have more choices of film and camera formats than ever before and it's up to us to decide upon a preference. It would be quite unreasonable to expect any manufacturer to produce different types of equipment and for it all to be fully interchangeable and affordable.
Comment by Kimbo posted on smc PENTAX-DA 16mm-45mm F4 ED at 01/09/2004 - 15:18
A 35-70mm lens would be a 2x zoom and 28-200mm would be a 7x zoom lens.
Comment by Kimbo posted on smc PENTAX-DA 16mm-45mm F4 ED at 31/08/2004 - 11:49


Being essentially a trimmed down SFX, the SF7 is somewhat dated - the AF is slow by today's standards but perfectly adequate for most situations and the centre-weighted metering requires careful use to get the best results.
IMO the SF range were very well built and even today represent an excellent introduction to AF SLR photography and the SF7 was aimed at beginners.
I'd be tempted to look for something like an MZ5 though, you should be able to pick one up for a similar amount