All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on KatzEye Screens at 03/08/2011 - 12:38
I tend to buy what I think I need or what may take my fancy. Most of my digital kit is a legacy carry over from film kit.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on If you like Pentax, should you only buy Pentax at 03/08/2011 - 12:13
Saying one thing and meaning another leads to misunderstandings, rather like the old "my 300mm lens is now a 450mm lens on this body" misconception.
You’re correct about the obvious as we both know his intent. There are those that do not and really would take it literally.
I missed the K20 and bought the K7, chances are, I will probably buy the next offering after the K5 (personally hoping that it will be FF). Whatever it is, I will not be putting down Pentax's previous offerings.
As to the OP's question, if you need faster AF, high ISO and want to stay solely in the Pentax camp, then yes it's worthwhile.
Best regards
You’re correct about the obvious as we both know his intent. There are those that do not and really would take it literally.
Smeggypants wrote:
In terms of the use of the word "tragic".... When I was a K20D/K10D owner I didn't have a problem with anyone saying the K20D/K10D had an ISO performance tragic in comparison to the K-5. I realised they were right and it encouraged me to sell sell all my wives and grannies in order to get a couple.
But prior to the K5, when there were cameras out there that already had very good high ISO performance you did without it. That to me, as a photographer, makes no sense at all . In terms of the use of the word "tragic".... When I was a K20D/K10D owner I didn't have a problem with anyone saying the K20D/K10D had an ISO performance tragic in comparison to the K-5. I realised they were right and it encouraged me to sell sell all my wives and grannies in order to get a couple.
I missed the K20 and bought the K7, chances are, I will probably buy the next offering after the K5 (personally hoping that it will be FF). Whatever it is, I will not be putting down Pentax's previous offerings.
As to the OP's question, if you need faster AF, high ISO and want to stay solely in the Pentax camp, then yes it's worthwhile.
Best regards
Frogfish wrote:
(the K7 is just tragic in comparison, I'd rarely go over 400 with 800 usually tops)
Great quote that will go down well with current K7 owners.(the K7 is just tragic in comparison, I'd rarely go over 400 with 800 usually tops)
Frogfish wrote:
the fact that in essence it has made all my lenses faster by being able to use those higher ISOs I'd never dream of using before.
May need clarification.the fact that in essence it has made all my lenses faster by being able to use those higher ISOs I'd never dream of using before.
Best regards
I wish. However, it's a little too far to travel. It will be a good event and is probably one of the best "free" photoshoots in the UK.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Whitby Goth Weekend, Saturday 5 November 2011 at 03/08/2011 - 00:36
I use a Slick 381 and 234RC2. A good combo, for me.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on monopod and head at 03/08/2011 - 00:28
I'm going to order KatzEye screens for the K7 and K10. Has anyone paid the extra for the OptiBrite version and is there really a difference?
link
Best regards
link
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on KatzEye Screens at 02/08/2011 - 00:13
08tiger wrote:
I like the way you captured the baby's eyes and the way it's looking around.The last one is pretty good to.Trial and error like you say.
Its just getting used to the FIV Don. Some of the above are cropped in slightly. My main concern at the moment is the indoor light focus on the K7. It's not always correct. I'm aware of it and try to refocus as required.I like the way you captured the baby's eyes and the way it's looking around.The last one is pretty good to.Trial and error like you say.
Just about to order a KatzEye screen for it.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Second outing with a 77mm. at 02/08/2011 - 00:09
I'm still working with the 77mm Ltd. I intend to push this lens as far as my K7 can push it.
gold coin. K7, 77mm, ISO 640
gently please. K7 - as above.
parental support. K7, as above, 1/20th sec.
attentive
grips, glass and images
an artist
So far? The 77mm Ltd is not a lens for the casual shooter. It seems very capable and can exaggerate any weakness in the focus system on a K7. For those that use a Katz eye screen and manual focus, it's a lens that can give 100%.
I feel that I need more time and better light to squeeze the best from this lens. So far, it's been a pleasure to use.
The FOV seems just too tight in some situations, that said, to be aware of its requirements is to be prepared and thus requires more thought about the shot.
gold coin. K7, 77mm, ISO 640
gently please. K7 - as above.
parental support. K7, as above, 1/20th sec.
attentive
grips, glass and images
an artist
So far? The 77mm Ltd is not a lens for the casual shooter. It seems very capable and can exaggerate any weakness in the focus system on a K7. For those that use a Katz eye screen and manual focus, it's a lens that can give 100%.
I feel that I need more time and better light to squeeze the best from this lens. So far, it's been a pleasure to use.
The FOV seems just too tight in some situations, that said, to be aware of its requirements is to be prepared and thus requires more thought about the shot.
Comment by K10D posted on Second outing with a 77mm. at 31/07/2011 - 14:49
No idea but that sig is absolutely ridiculous.
Best regards