Color Munki Display is good Simon, not sure if it's exactly what you want but it does a good job on my Eizo...

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews/profiling/colormunki_display.html

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/colormunki-display-monitor-projector-laptop-ca...

Of course it will get them out of trouble, I mean it's better than a 645D now isn't it

Nokia are proper mad they are...

Eek!

For emergency/lightweight/travel use I now use this A Gorillapod DSLR, with Manfrotto 494 head, holds the K5 with the 60-250 easily!
Excuse shot quality, HTC Desire
Just Fits in the front pocket of my Retrospective ten...




Shot taken with my last K5 and the same Combination

We're getting into this sort of thing with graphics these days,
Now I'm talking Macs here but you get the idea...

A discrete or dedicated Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) has its own RAM that's independent of the computer's RAM. For instance, the NVIDIA 8600M GT in a MacBook Pro has 512 MB of video RAM that's totally separate from its 4 GB of normal RAM. That 512 MB of RAM on the GPU is used only for graphics processing. Having its own dedicated RAM makes the GPU process graphics much faster, leading to increased performance.

One downside of dedicated GPUs is that they generate a great deal of heat. The GPU is often the hottest-running component in your Mac, especially if your Mac is portable. Another downside, which is more important in terms of performance, is that dedicated GPUs are very power-hungry, and they can drain a portable Mac's battery very quickly. Finally, dedicated GPUs also cost more than integrated GPUs, which drives up the cost of the entire computer; this is one reason why the MacBook has always had an integrated GPU rather than a discrete one.

Integrated GPUs don't have their own RAM. Instead, they utilize some of the system's RAM. The original MacBook's Intel GMA 950, for example, would use a minimum 80 MB of system RAM for graphics processing. The current MacBook's NVIDIA GeForce 9400M uses a minimum of 256 MB of system RAM. The upshots of integrated GPUs are that they're cheaper (meaning a less expensive computer), they put out much less heat (making them ideal for smaller Macs like the MacBook or MacBook Air), and they use far less power than a discrete unit.

For everyday graphics processing, video, Flash, and even 2D gaming, these integrated GPUs usually work well enough to get the job done. Where integrated GPUs fall flat is in 3D gaming. Because they don't have their own dedicated RAM, and because their processing units are generally much less powerful than those in dedicated GPUs, integrated graphics are usually considered suboptimal for 3D games.

All of this doesn't mean that you can't play 3D games on a Mac with an integrated GPU, but you probably wouldn't want to. Reports from Steam's forums indicate that users have been able to get Portal, a graphically-intensive 3D game, to run on an older MacBook's Intel GMA 950. However, the frame rate was generally only 9 to 15 frames per second (FPS). Ideally, you want a 3D game to be running at 30 FPS or more; if it runs at anything much less than 30 FPS, you're going to notice a great deal of stuttering and slowdown in the graphics. A frame rate of less than 15 FPS renders a 3D game pretty much unplayable.

More modern Macs' integrated GPUs, like the NVIDIA 9400M and NVIDIA GeForce 320M, will handle 3D gaming better than the MacBook's original Intel integrated graphics. However, you'll still most likely have to turn the games' graphics to lower settings in order to get a smooth frame rate.
Same idea goes for most graphics GPU's these days it's just handy to know you've got an extra resource to hand...

Thanks John, saved me some cash!

You are completely correct there, I meant to add that in, I have a tape drive in the drawer at home an Iomega if I'm not mistaken, payed a fortune for it and it's not worth fifty pence now, just no market for it...

Exactly what I have just done Simon!

Quite a lot of industry is still using tape backups, last large IT firm I worked for had a big contract with Capita Symonds and we were backing up to 28 tapes at the end of every week there! That was about twelve months ago and before my total midlife crisis!
No more IT for me!

I think Internet Based (Cloud) will be the way forward for storage as it's just so scaleable and convenient, and with the drive to boost everyones internet speeds a bit. It may/will become quite realistic to back up large amounts of files but industry wide there is a lot of mistrust, it will get there, some like me need safeguards for the safeguards, I'm a bit of a luddite methinks...