PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
JAK wrote:
johnriley wrote:
I think I'd direct you to SRS or Park Cameras, to name but two, where there is everything Pentax at excellent prices.
Perhaps it would be better if their 'find a dealer' page said that!

John
Maybe so, but we know here where to look. Perhaps someone could usefully drop a line to the website and tell them that there are some things that need attantion and what, specifically, these are. IMHO that would be useful and constructive.

Comment by johnriley posted on Local stockists of Pentax? at 16/04/2012 - 21:55

johnriley
bforbes wrote:
Just back from Whitby.. Thermals are recommended for future visits
We are also just back from Whitby...apart from it being a bit blustery the sun shone and it was pretty good!

Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 16/04/2012 - 21:53

johnriley
Hyram wrote:
Wait is my advice, which is what I am doing.
What are waitng for?

Comment by johnriley posted on Updating from K 20 at 16/04/2012 - 21:51

johnriley
I think I'd direct you to SRS or Park Cameras, to name but two, where there is everything Pentax at excellent prices.

As long as we can get supplies of what we want, for now I don't see this as a problem. No doubt in due course the new company will address whatever shortcomings there are.

Comment by johnriley posted on Local stockists of Pentax? at 16/04/2012 - 21:48

johnriley
There's a process that has to unfold and there are time scales to it once you involve PayPal.

Comment by johnriley posted on advice needed at 16/04/2012 - 18:58

johnriley
The Praktica is not well engineered compared to Pentax, so I really think that the choice is clear. Also, the shutter releases are quite poor so again if you want something that is slick to operate then the Pentax Spotmatics seem the best option, by a long margin.

Comment by johnriley posted on Sensible M42 metered body to use today? at 16/04/2012 - 18:56

johnriley
As nothing actually happened, and there was no attempt to interfere with what the OP was doing, there's no need to get steamed up or take any action. No good would come of it I'm sure.

Comment by johnriley posted on A pleasant afternoon:spoiled at 16/04/2012 - 18:27

johnriley
If you do that you will be artificially altering the relationship between the RGB cnannels and you may well not get what you expect. There are reasons for looking at three channels separately, but generally looking at the overall histogram is all we need to do.

Comment by johnriley posted on Histogram at 14/04/2012 - 23:20

johnriley
You may well change the composition by zooming, but don't forget that it is only by moving position that you can explore the changes in perspective. Zooms can lead to lazier photography, but nonetheless they are the right choice for many photographers.

Comment by johnriley posted on What is the use of a prime ? at 13/04/2012 - 23:47

johnriley
I know what you mean, it's a slow process at best, but Digital ICE will not see detail that is covered by dust. It's in a way like cloning everything in sight rather than cleaning the sensor.

For a quick scan that's one thing, but to do a high quality job then that's something else. It's why I rarely scan. It takes too long unless it's really needed.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 13/04/2012 - 12:09

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo