PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
I was curious as to whether or not cameras/lenses are expensive or not compared to when I started in photography.

We can find the details for specific items ourselves as there are plenty of inflation calculators on the web. But here are two examples.

Using the Eric Fishwick 1984/1985 catalogue as the price source, an LX with FA-1 finder would have cost £371.50. A K-3 body even at release price costs £1099.00. Adjusting the LX for inflation, it is equivalent to £1012.95.

A lens cap cost £3.00, adjusted the price today would be £8.18. The SRS price for a similar cap today is £6.99.

My first SLR was the SP1000 with 55mm f/2 lens. £99.95 then, around 1978, that would be £526.86 now. I could still comfortably get into the Pentax system with that amount of cash.

Interesting.

Comment by johnriley posted on Inflation Calculator re Prices at 08/10/2013 - 08:38

johnriley
Possibly so. Having said that I don't think lenses or cameras are expensive. Not when we think of the huge investment behind them and the level of technology and complexity involved.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax's Lenses are cheap... at 08/10/2013 - 08:24

johnriley
Quote:

In the interests of good photography isn't it better to vote on what you think is the best image rather than vote simply because of what brand camera was used to take the shot?
Absolutely.

Comment by johnriley posted on Country File at 08/10/2013 - 08:00

johnriley
SRS are also offering a £100 part exchange bonus, so there's your £999.00 right at launch.

Comment by johnriley posted on Officially K-3? at 08/10/2013 - 07:59

johnriley
I've answered your question as best I can and no more do I know.

Comment by johnriley posted on Will pentax user be come Ricoh user ? at 08/10/2013 - 00:42

johnriley
Not sure what point you're making here Shaun.

I think there are more pressing things to fret about than speculating on the unknown future. It really doesn't matter what the range is called, but clearly Ricoh have decided Pentax will apply to DSLRs and RIcoh to compacts.

Which is what they said right from the beginning.

Comment by johnriley posted on Will pentax user be come Ricoh user ? at 08/10/2013 - 00:33

johnriley
Yes, I'm sure. Have a look at the front of the camera.

Comment by johnriley posted on Will pentax user be come Ricoh user ? at 08/10/2013 - 00:27

johnriley
The 55-300mm was crying out to be a WR lens, so it's good that it now is. I guess the price will settle given a little time. It usually does.

Comment by johnriley posted on HD Pentax-DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED WR at 08/10/2013 - 00:26

johnriley
It isn't called the Ricoh K-3, it's called the Pentax K-3. Ricoh Imaging is the company that makes Pentax cameras and lenses.

Pentax User remains Pentax User.

Hope that clears it up for you!

Comment by johnriley posted on Will pentax user be come Ricoh user ? at 08/10/2013 - 00:24

johnriley
Nonetheless, let's keep a semblance of being on topic. It's all looking good, so as and when I come to upgrade again it will be the K-3. Unfortunately there isn't endless cash to continually upgrade for the sake of it so I'll be concentrating on making images with the K-5 bodies that we already have.

Of course, "there isn't endless cash" could be slightly flexible.....

Comment by johnriley posted on Officially K-3? at 08/10/2013 - 00:20

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo