johnha

Joined: 17th February 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnha
Fabulous lens at a very good price - If I didn't already have one I'd snap it up... and I don't even have a K-1 (makes a great 'fast-ish 50' on APS-C)...

Gareth, I wouldn't sell mine for that little.

Comment by johnha posted on Pentax FA 35mm f2 at 13/10/2018 - 23:28

johnha
Kim C wrote:
As to some of the older lenses, I think it is more our "perception" of them rather than them actually being worse on a digital sensor. True the big difference between a digital sensor and film is that film has a much wider angle of acceptance. This can be critical but in reality the most "affected" camera/lens combos are mirrorless. On some the back of the rear element is only a few millimetres from the sensor plane. On an SLR with a mirror box it is never that extreme.
+1 for the whole post. I agree with pretty much all of it.

There are those who need very few lenses and prefer primes to zooms - they sling a camera over their shoulder and shoot the world (or their life) with a 28, 35 or 50mm on the front. Many Leica users work like this, small compact, fast, very good quality primes (expensive too but manageable if you only need a few lenses). I sometimes work like this with my P6x7 - body, prism, one prime (either 45, 55, or 90), I find one prime allows me to concentrate more on the image.

I can see this new 50 doing very well in that kind of scenario - with WR on a K-1, probably as close to indestructible as you can get. However, it is very expensive to spend much of it's time sitting in a bag because the camera has an f/2.8 zoom on the front or a huge heavy 15-30 by default, only making rare appearances. In this case an FA50 is likely to be a more sensible choice.

A similar discussion on legacy glass exists in the MF world when discussing 645 A/FA & 6x7 lenses on the D & Z. There are some weaker lenses (known to be weaker on film), but many are still very good as long as you work within sensible aperture limits (obviously you're not using the whole image circle).

John.

Comment by johnha posted on Pentax D-FA*50/1.4 introduced by Ricoh (UK) and SRS at 11/10/2018 - 14:22

johnha
.
JAK wrote:
I thought you wanted fast auto focussing, that sounds like a step backwards!
...and more compact lenses designed to get the best out of the sensor...

Comment by johnha posted on Pentax to Sony lens adapters at 05/10/2018 - 11:10

johnha
Excellent shots put into context by the comprehensive commentary, I've enjoyed them enormously.

Could we consider another section in this forum for 'photo essay' work such as this so they could be easily found and kept together?

John

Comment by johnha posted on Spokane WA , USA at 02/10/2018 - 16:26

johnha
Excellent shots Gareth.

Comment by johnha posted on Jacksons Bay Lighthouse at 02/10/2018 - 16:20

johnha
Firmware updating needs to be as simple and reliable as possible and also needs to take account that you may need to recover 'corrupted' firmware. By pressing Menu when switching the camera on, the boot loader responsible for updating the firmware, can short-cut the boot-up sequence (if the firmware is corrupt there would be no way to boot it to select a menu option). By holding down a button, the boot-loader (often stored in read only memory) can jump straight to the upload routine and attempt to load the new firmware, irrespective of whether. the current firmware is corrupted or not.

John.

Comment by johnha posted on Go Your Own Way? at 02/10/2018 - 11:24

johnha
Hi All, just spotted this on Real Camera's website - Pentax LX & 50mm link. It's a while since I bought mine so hard to know about pricing (sounds reasonable to me - I recently paid half this for a CLA on mine). If I were buying an LX, one from a dealer would be my preference. I've bought various P6x7 gear off them in the past.

John.

Comment by johnha posted on Pentax LX at Real Camera, Manchester at 20/09/2018 - 15:13

johnha
I only use the genuine ones too (never tried a cheap but not inclined to either). There have been various issues reported with non-genuine 645 adapters for 6x7 lenses on the 645D & Z - why you'd risk a non-genuine adapter on an expensive camera is anyone's guess.

Comment by johnha posted on GENUINE PENTAX K TO M42 ADAPTOR at 31/08/2018 - 11:58

johnha
I really like the FA43 on film (I don't have a K-1), but it's too long for me on APS-C. I haven't used them, but I'm not a great fan of the concept of the DA Ltds - having manual film cameras means I need an aperture ring. I really like the dual purpose of the FA35/2 - a good focal length for film/FF and a fast-ish 50 on APS-C (useful if I travel with the K-5 and film).

smudge wrote:
An alternative suggestion would be to purchase a Ricoh GR. Excellent results on an APS-C sensor and small enough to slip into your pocket. Costs very little more than a limited prime.
+1, much less bulky than a DSLR and 28mm equivalent and produces excellent results.

Comment by johnha posted on If you could only have one Limited prime lens (inc. the 20-40)....... at 30/08/2018 - 01:21

johnha
I prefer the thickness of the 5p, less likely to slip I feel.

The MX service manual is available here link - looks very complicated but the exploded diagram shows the baseplate/battery compartment quite well.

Comment by johnha posted on Seized battery cover Pentax MX at 22/08/2018 - 16:29

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo