All Forum Comments
Comment by JAK posted on Upgrade from Pentax 18-250mm (at wide end!) at 30/06/2012 - 00:03
The Pentax 12-24 gives a far more pleasing image in my opinion if the extreme wide angle isn't for you. But the 8-16mm is terrific value for what it is (when I got it it was cheaper than the 10-20mm) however I see SRS currently have a special price on the Sigma 10-20 so that might be the most affordable at present. The 10-20 isn't a bad lens when it comes to sharpness, it's just that vignetting puts me off using it (Carl's examples do exhibit this.)
If you wish I'll take three similar views tomorrow using the Sigmas 8-16 and 10-20 and the Pentax 12-24 each set at around 12mm which may give a useful comparison.
John
Comment by JAK posted on Upgrade from Pentax 18-250mm (at wide end!) at 29/06/2012 - 23:59
4 years is a lifetime in digital technology. 4 years use out of digital slr I feel is good going.
Folk using early Pentax film cameras haven't seen the need to ditch them after four years thank goodness.
John
Comment by JAK posted on K100D Dead at 29/06/2012 - 13:16
However, from next time, this fortnightly comp will become a monthly one and it too will be held in the gallery, so from then on, that requirement will cease to apply.
John
Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Fortnightly Competition 96 "Heritage" at 28/06/2012 - 14:57
John
Comment by JAK posted on Olympic steam up at 28/06/2012 - 13:31
Really good set of photos there David. Well done.
John
PS Does anyone know if any of the old 'Marine Drive' buses are still in existence? - They were a bit like the Blackpool Coronation trams, single decker with a centre door. (There's a pic of the tram here link)
Comment by JAK posted on Olympic steam up at 26/06/2012 - 21:22
John
Comment by JAK posted on Fortnightly Competition 96 "Heritage" at 23/06/2012 - 09:35
Oh sorry, I've browsed through the rules, but haven't found any of these restrictions. Sorry again.
Will keep it in mind for the next time.
From that link you say you browsed, I quote:
1. All entries must be images taken within 14 days of the current theme being set; [ie between now and a week on Wednesday]
2. Full Exif data should be supplied with each image, including date/time of capture;
3. Image should not exceed 800 pixels width; [that applies to all photos you link to in threads but not in the weekly competions.]
4. Deadline for submission of entries is 1800 GMT every other Wednesday;
etc....
Here's the link in full:
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/fortnightly-competition-rules-8652
I suspect you may be mixing up the rules for the weekly competition that does allow you to use your back catalogue. But no worries.
John
Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Fortnightly Competition 96 "Heritage" at 21/06/2012 - 01:20
Sorry to be slightly unorthodox here by adding a comment so early after the first picture has been posted. But the fact it was posted so soon got me curious. The usual rules referred to can be found in this section here and only entries photographed after the competition has been announced are eligible. So a photo taken in November last year isn't!! Also it's too big (wider than 800 pixels!)
Given you're new to all this surfhelds, and thanks for entering, however I recommend we forget that one above on this occasion (however excellent it might be) and suggest you take another especially and enter that so that all entrants are abiding the same rules!
Hope that is OK with everyone else.
John
nb I'll also post this comment in the comps other thread.
Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Fortnightly Competition 96 "Heritage" at 21/06/2012 - 00:29
John
Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Fortnightly Competition 96 "Heritage" at 21/06/2012 - 00:17


I've got the DA 17-70 and it is rarely off the camera. I tried the 15mm f/4 but it didn't seem significantly wider considering the expense.
John