All Forum Comments
Comment by JAK posted on Import Duty at 18/11/2013 - 17:06
cameraboy wrote:
Is it not that the firmware is not up to date with useage of said apperatuse.
There is only the original firmware for the K-3, no updates have been released yet (but we're only at week two so hardly surprising.)Is it not that the firmware is not up to date with useage of said apperatuse.
John K
Comment by JAK posted on K3 cancel AF problem ? at 18/11/2013 - 16:59
Hip hop, a prosthesis? Hope the recovery went well.
John K
John K
Comment by JAK posted on Bequeathing your flickr images at 18/11/2013 - 16:52
The Macro Limited version is f2.8. They'd be a terrific bargain for £150 but sadly they aren't those, unless its a local mistake.
If its this one, it isn't macro, despite what they say: link.
The macro version would cost more than double that.
John K
If its this one, it isn't macro, despite what they say: link.
The macro version would cost more than double that.
John K
Algernon wrote:
Can't read it I wonder if they ever sorted out who
owns MP3's after someone dies?
--
You can if you register for the free account.Can't read it I wonder if they ever sorted out who
owns MP3's after someone dies?
--
Solution - don't rely on corporate storage, buy a NAS instead.
John K
Comment by JAK posted on Bequeathing your flickr images at 17/11/2013 - 12:20
GaJoe wrote:
I've seen the "crippled mount" comment several times but I do not know to what problem with the current mount it refers. Could someone edumacate me, please? Thanks.
See here for info on this.I've seen the "crippled mount" comment several times but I do not know to what problem with the current mount it refers. Could someone edumacate me, please? Thanks.
[quote="Bojidar Dimitrov"]The only reason for the existence of this mount variation is cost cutting. This was achieved by leaving out the stop-down coupler of the body mount and the aperture ring of the lens mount. With this move Pentax sacrificed one of its strongest advantages, the unrivaled K-mount compatibility.
The combination of a "crippled" KAF body with any lens functions perfectly if the following two conditions are met:
The lens that is used has an aperture ring with an "A" setting,
The "A" setting is engaged.
The combination of a "crippled" KAF lens with any body functions perfectly if the following two conditions are met:
The body supports P ot Tv operation,
One of the above settings is selected.[/quote]John K
Comment by JAK posted on Full Frame (again) at 15/11/2013 - 19:43
JAK wrote:
what's the betting they still turn up?
They just did!what's the betting they still turn up?
John K
Comment by JAK posted on K3 use with remote control at 14/11/2013 - 12:46
Yep, a small world! Hope they didn't get caught in the Hainault tornado last year.
It is very easy to forget you changed things like the exposure compensation previously and puzzle why subsequent shots come out odd. I had a batch of monochrome images once that I wasn't expecting - thought the camera had gone wrong until I realised I'd unknowingly changed the custom image settings! It's easily done.
John K
It is very easy to forget you changed things like the exposure compensation previously and puzzle why subsequent shots come out odd. I had a batch of monochrome images once that I wasn't expecting - thought the camera had gone wrong until I realised I'd unknowingly changed the custom image settings! It's easily done.
John K
Comment by JAK posted on Under chin Ghost? at 14/11/2013 - 12:06
fatspider wrote:
has anyone tried Ebid?
Have you?has anyone tried Ebid?
John K
Comment by JAK posted on Where Do We Draw The Line? at 14/11/2013 - 01:23
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cactus-V4-Wireless-Flash-Trigger-Set-Transmitter-Recei...
or
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cactus-PT-04-Wireless-Flash-Trigger-boxed-/13104616463...
John K