All Forum Comments
Comment by i-Berg posted on Band in studio at 21/05/2010 - 13:53
Good band that, Oggy!
Comment by i-Berg posted on Another pointless thread at 21/05/2010 - 12:17
...and perhaps drumming up business for the aforementioned beauty contest:
Comment by i-Berg posted on Another pointless thread at 21/05/2010 - 11:29
Rather a regal creature - was it you that adopted this cat as a 'stray'? (and if so, who has done the 'adoption'?)...
Comment by i-Berg posted on Minx the cat at 21/05/2010 - 11:28
Yet - perhaps the contradiction (eating an apple with a knife and fork) - IS the point, and draws one's attention to the sparseness of the image? I wonder if the utensils are actually rather cleverly positioned, in order to draw the eye to the fruit? Simple yet effective for me...
Comment by i-Berg posted on Pictures for kitchen at 21/05/2010 - 11:22
(except - it's still thin...)
Comment by i-Berg posted on Depth of field? Who needs it? at 21/05/2010 - 11:13
grahamwalton wrote:
With this weather, there is very little going down the drain.
I am just off to the Cotswolds with Pentax KX, K20 and 3 bags of lenses.
The old pullover is in the boot though.
Along with the spare socks, no doubt! With this weather, there is very little going down the drain.
I am just off to the Cotswolds with Pentax KX, K20 and 3 bags of lenses.
The old pullover is in the boot though.
Comment by i-Berg posted on Another pointless thread at 21/05/2010 - 11:08
Take it off! You are unlikely to need it - contemporary digital sensors have little if any sensitivity to UV when compared to the film emulsions of 35 film SLRs. If you have a front lens element that needs special protection (not sure why!), then perhaps you might consider a UV filter -otherwise, it's just another obstacle between you and a clean image.
Comment by i-Berg posted on UV Filter fogging the element at 21/05/2010 - 11:06
Comment by i-Berg posted on You gonna mess with this guy? at 20/05/2010 - 13:15
What's the unifying theme? Is it their home town? Their name? &c...