hefty1

Joined: 28th June 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

hefty1
I've got a silver 77 - it always makes other photographers do a double-take when I'm out and about, which is nice...

Oh yes, and it takes sublime pictures too! One of my all-time favourite lenses.

Comment by hefty1 posted on Fa77mm F1.8 ltd from Amazon at 04/08/2009 - 18:40

hefty1
Yes, the Pentax Remote software is a bit rubbish (and I understand it's been dropped entirely for the K7 which speaks volumes).

You did well with the photo above though - can't have been easy to get them to stay still, look at the camera *and* take the shot all at the same time! Sort of job I'd have run a mile from

Comment by hefty1 posted on Direct Photo Preview at 04/08/2009 - 18:33

hefty1
Sounds like a serious case of buyer's remorse to me. Perhaps he's not a photographer and just realised he's out of his depth?

Comment by hefty1 posted on Used K-7 for sale already at 03/08/2009 - 23:49

hefty1
The software is bundled with the K20D but obviously it'll need setting up on the PC you're using. Also, it's not particularly intuitive so it'd be best to have a practice with it before using it in anger so to speak.

Comment by hefty1 posted on Direct Photo Preview at 03/08/2009 - 23:47

hefty1
johnriley wrote:
The Takumar (bayonet) lenses were in fact coated, with conventional coatings and not the SMC treatment.
I stand corrected! In my defence I've never actually owned one

George Lazarette wrote:
The sad thing is that original Takumars were the very pinnacle of Japanese lens-making. They were superb both optically and mechanically.

If you can get hold of a good 55mm SMC Tak you will find the focus ring moves like silk lubricated with purest Jersey cream.

Makes me salivate just thinking about it.

G
They are by far and away the best built lenses I've ever encountered bar none (and I include such royalty as Leica and Zeiss in that comparison). It's quite a while now since the cheap Taks were dropped so maybe it's time for Pentax to bring the name back again? I think it's got a much nicer ring to it than "Limited".

Comment by hefty1 posted on Takumar lenses? at 03/08/2009 - 23:44

hefty1
Clarky beat me to it

Comment by hefty1 posted on Takumar lenses? at 03/08/2009 - 23:31

hefty1
Takumar is a Pentax brand.

In the old (M42 screw mount) days all lenses made by Asahi Optical were branded "Takumar" and bodies were branded "Pentax".

In the 1970's the company introduced the K-mount and all bodies *and* lenses were branded "Pentax". A few years later the Takumar name was resurrected for use on a small band of uncoated budget optics which are generally considered inferior to their SMC Pentax equivalents.

This tack upset a lot of Pentaxians as up until then the name Takumar on a lens had been a seal of the highest quality, the later lenses effectively killed Takumar as a brand.

There endeth the brief history lesson

Comment by hefty1 posted on Takumar lenses? at 03/08/2009 - 23:30

hefty1
George Lazarette wrote:
The Outbox should be renamed Unread box.

G
I concur

Comment by hefty1 posted on Question re PM's at 03/08/2009 - 22:36

hefty1
It only moves from your outbox to your sentbox once the other person has actually read it - if it's still there then it just hasn't been picked up yet.

Comment by hefty1 posted on Question re PM's at 03/08/2009 - 22:25

hefty1
Strange, can't say I've ever seen the "Tower" suffix used before in reference to a K100D (or any other Pentax camera for that matter). Perhaps this was some sort of non-UK-market special edition? If it's a just a bog-standard K100D Super then I can't imagine there'll be many takers at that sort of price!

Comment by hefty1 posted on K100D Super at 03/08/2009 - 14:30

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo