All Forum Comments
Comment by hefty1 posted on Fa77mm F1.8 ltd from Amazon at 04/08/2009 - 18:40
You did well with the photo above though - can't have been easy to get them to stay still, look at the camera *and* take the shot all at the same time! Sort of job I'd have run a mile from
Comment by hefty1 posted on Direct Photo Preview at 04/08/2009 - 18:33
Comment by hefty1 posted on Used K-7 for sale already at 03/08/2009 - 23:49
Comment by hefty1 posted on Direct Photo Preview at 03/08/2009 - 23:47
The Takumar (bayonet) lenses were in fact coated, with conventional coatings and not the SMC treatment.
The sad thing is that original Takumars were the very pinnacle of Japanese lens-making. They were superb both optically and mechanically.
If you can get hold of a good 55mm SMC Tak you will find the focus ring moves like silk lubricated with purest Jersey cream.
Makes me salivate just thinking about it.
G
Comment by hefty1 posted on Takumar lenses? at 03/08/2009 - 23:44
Comment by hefty1 posted on Takumar lenses? at 03/08/2009 - 23:31
In the old (M42 screw mount) days all lenses made by Asahi Optical were branded "Takumar" and bodies were branded "Pentax".
In the 1970's the company introduced the K-mount and all bodies *and* lenses were branded "Pentax". A few years later the Takumar name was resurrected for use on a small band of uncoated budget optics which are generally considered inferior to their SMC Pentax equivalents.
This tack upset a lot of Pentaxians as up until then the name Takumar on a lens had been a seal of the highest quality, the later lenses effectively killed Takumar as a brand.
There endeth the brief history lesson
Comment by hefty1 posted on Takumar lenses? at 03/08/2009 - 23:30
The Outbox should be renamed Unread box.
G
Comment by hefty1 posted on Question re PM's at 03/08/2009 - 22:36
Comment by hefty1 posted on Question re PM's at 03/08/2009 - 22:25
Comment by hefty1 posted on K100D Super at 03/08/2009 - 14:30


Oh yes, and it takes sublime pictures too! One of my all-time favourite lenses.