All Forum Comments
Comment by hefty1 posted on K7 Review at The Register at 18/01/2010 - 14:23
I've been tempted to trade my GR-D in for a GX200 on a couple of occasions (for the extra lens range flexibility) but then I look at the pictures the GR-D takes and its lovely svelte lines and I really don't want to part with it.
Comment by hefty1 posted on My new P&S ? at 18/01/2010 - 14:15
I have found 645n on ebay with 45mm and a 75mm Lens so I might buy it what is a good price £300.00??
link
I think £300.00 just for the lenses is good price but please advise
James
Comment by hefty1 posted on pentax 645nii wanted at 18/01/2010 - 14:06
The folks on the MFF seem to rate the Helios 44-2 f/2 58mm highly and I am tempted to get one to try.
Comment by hefty1 posted on New uses for old lenses at 18/01/2010 - 00:12
So - should I put the CX1 further down my list of possibles after your experience ?
Comment by hefty1 posted on My new P&S ? at 17/01/2010 - 23:29
[IMG]http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd37/hefty1969/competition%20stuff/IMGP3482.jpg[/IMG]
Couldn't get out to take a photo of the stairs I wanted, so I made some pop-up ones instead.
K10D | DA35 | f/6.7 | 1/180sec | ISO100 | Flash
Assembled and photographed today, 17 January 2010
Comment by hefty1 posted on Fortnightly Competition # 33 - STAIRS at 17/01/2010 - 23:19
Comment by hefty1 posted on My new P&S ? at 17/01/2010 - 11:57
Comment by hefty1 posted on In the Jungle of the nigh at 17/01/2010 - 01:31
The trade off is that the lower the ISO the longer the exposure you need to make in order to get your shot - if the light is anything other than bright (think sunny summer days bright) then using the lowest ISO setting will no doubt lead to exposures that are long enough to induce camera shake. Hence to get a better image you need to move to a higher ISO setting.
So the "optimal" ISO setting is the lowest you can get away with without shake ruining your photo. Depending on the prevailing light that could be anywhere on the scale.
Your GX10 will provide perfectly acceptable images up to ISO400 (where I tend to be for brightly lit indoor scenes), reasonable images at ISO800 (dimly lit interiors) but quite noisy images at ISO1600 (which I try and avoid if possible).
Photography is all about trade-offs and a noisy but sharp picture is generally preferred to a clean but blurry one. Experiment a bit and you'll find for yourself what works based on what you find acceptable.
Hope that helps!
Comment by hefty1 posted on optimal iso settings at 17/01/2010 - 01:24
Comment by hefty1 posted on My new P&S ? at 17/01/2010 - 00:38

