GrahamNR17

Joined: 28th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

GrahamNR17
That's fabulous, you really get to know your lenses, don't you John?

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on 50mm Primes f2 at 16/01/2009 - 19:30

GrahamNR17
Could be a moderately interesting exercise when the weather's too lousy to partake of your favourite kind of photography. If only to satisfy curiosity.

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on 50mm Primes f2 at 16/01/2009 - 19:22

GrahamNR17
[quote:3496ace15f="johnriley"]
Quote:

Carl Zeiss Jena are East German lenses made after the war split Germany. The quality is fair, designs being based on pre-war Zeiss lenses.
Generally a reasonable comment, but if you ever get the chance to use a CZJ 135/3.5 (the MC S version in particular) you'd very quickly change your mind. It could hold it's own against any similar lens made before or since. Bar none.

Don't even get me started on the Flektogon, Mir 1, etc

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on Non Pentax Cameras at 16/01/2009 - 19:07

GrahamNR17
Interesting, but I've never owned both concurrently so couldn't say. Anyone got both?

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on 50mm Primes f2 at 16/01/2009 - 17:46

GrahamNR17
johnriley wrote:

And another - what if "the retailer" was in fact the New Assistant who got a bit muddled?

Discuss....
Then presumably they'd be the New Assistant at a different shop by the weekend

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on Does anyone know where I stand? at 16/01/2009 - 17:06

GrahamNR17
Phew, just got mine in time then I got the Pentax-M version, but the A version is definitely more useful on a K digital.

The 1.7s are fetching well over their value on fleabay, IMHO. Either way, really happy with my f2, really sharp

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on 50mm Primes f2 at 16/01/2009 - 17:02

GrahamNR17
Gwyn wrote:
Sorry Jack but I still think the gallery, and the competitions, should be for Pentax only, you could post photos from other makes on the forum under Your Photos. Otherwise we might as well just open the whole thing up and forget it is a Pentax User site.
Yep, I think Pentax needs to feature somewhere in the photo, either camera or lens. It is a Pentax User forum at the end of the day. That said, if a member also has a pocket camera (for example) of another make, it's not unreasonable that if they captured a really great shot that they wanted to share that they can post it up.

Just my tuppence worth

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on Non Pentax Cameras at 15/01/2009 - 22:11

GrahamNR17
Did anyone say "kleptomania"

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on Non Pentax Cameras at 15/01/2009 - 19:28

GrahamNR17
I think non-Pentax equipment is essential, as it acts as an excellent comparison. Most of my lenses are non-Pentax, and to be honest I'd not have it any other way. Wild horses and a crow bar wouldn't part me from the couple of bits of Zeiss glass I have, and similarly for the Russian Zeiss clones. I won't even mention my home-made accessories I think that while most people (especially on here) will sing the praises of Pentax quality, they understand that Petax aren't only manufacturer of high quality cameras and optics that ever graced our hobby. Some lenses from other manufacturers will suit a particular photographic aim better than a Pentax optic, and vice versa.

In summary, I'm all in favour of a healthy mix

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on Non Pentax Cameras at 15/01/2009 - 17:01

GrahamNR17
You should probably get it done then. Pristine ones are fetching stupid money on Fleabay. Prepare yourself for it being a hundred quid or more though, but what price an old friend?

Comment by GrahamNR17 posted on SMC Takumar 135mm problem at 14/01/2009 - 17:15

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo