Frogfish

Joined: 10th September 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Frogfish
Blythman wrote:
Wrong way around. The male has an all black bill, whilst the female has a red/orange lower mandible
Oops ! Naturlich ! Oh well it is verry late here (that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it) !

Comment by Frogfish posted on My afternoon beside the river at 25/07/2011 - 20:20

Frogfish
Really really nice set !

Can you do anything re. vignetting in #1 ? Seems to be the only shot exhibiting obvious vignetting.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Graffiti Passage at 25/07/2011 - 18:32

Frogfish
pentaxanne wrote:
nice set of kings, but he is a she
Ha ha - yes i noticed that. The male has a red lower mandible.

Comment by Frogfish posted on My afternoon beside the river at 25/07/2011 - 18:29

Frogfish
PentaxExpert wrote:
Tip: get rid of thr blurring by using a fast shutter speed. Something like 1/2000 would do the job nicely.
ROFL !

Comment by Frogfish posted on Bats.........Again! at 25/07/2011 - 10:49

Frogfish
Superb set Nipper ! Just great ! Though I have to say I couldn't find the little buggers in #5 thru #8 !!

Comment by Frogfish posted on My afternoon beside the river at 25/07/2011 - 10:44

Frogfish
Well done ! It is incredibly difficult to photograph bats without using something like an infra-red 'trip-wire' !

I've tried a few times with miserable results. They are too fast and I'm too slow.

Comment by Frogfish posted on Bats.........Again! at 25/07/2011 - 10:41

Frogfish
Great capture Mike !

Comment by Frogfish posted on Damsel .. in no distress at 24/07/2011 - 10:01

Frogfish
Les. It's not quite as simple as just deciding how much of the subject you want in focus, though that is of course one of the factors for consideration, as there is the relationship of the holy trinity of Focus + Shutter Speed + ISO that comes into play with every shot. When you change one of them that will affect one (or both) of the others depending on what it is you are shooting and what you are trying to achieve.

I think the best advice I can give here is to search the net for articles on the trinity - Photography on the Net, Luminous Landscape etc. may have lessons that can explain this interaction far better than I can. However it is imperative this to learn to be able to progress.

I would then suggest just playing around with the settings and watching what happens to the others when you change one of them and then maybe trying to set the camera to M to set them all yourself and see the effects each setting has on your test shots when you change them.

Good luck !

Comment by Frogfish posted on I need advice, again at 23/07/2011 - 16:20

Frogfish
Just reading about this lens last week. Supposedly the easiest & cheapest way to get to a 1:1 macro. All macro lenses are sharp so that shouldn't be an issue but the build quality, as mentioned, is iffy. Good value for money.

Comment by Frogfish posted on cosina 100 macro AF at 23/07/2011 - 06:09

Frogfish
nepw wrote:
I read the comments made but do not under stand half of what writen,I have a Tamron 70 300mm pentax fit it works fine on my K20,I shoot air displays, wild life,weddings,ect so what are you others trying to say
I used to have this lens and IMO it is the best value-for-money lens on the market. So cheap but so good.

However when comparing it to better lenses then of course it is going to lose out. The DA*300 cost nearly x10 more but certainly isn't x10 better ..... but there is no denying the difference (same goes for the Sigma 100-300/4 at a little less). Cost/ IQ ratio is not relative !

Comment by Frogfish posted on Lenses up to 300mm at 20/07/2011 - 16:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo