All Forum Comments
That's odd! I thought it was Tuesday!!
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Another pointless thread at 04/10/2011 - 11:46
DrOrloff wrote:
They are discussing it on the Jeremy Vine show.
Apparently, there are scantily clad girls draping themselves over gravestones followed around by packs of old codgers.
Surely not
Ah!, but have these "old codgers" got their Pentaxes with them?They are discussing it on the Jeremy Vine show.
Apparently, there are scantily clad girls draping themselves over gravestones followed around by packs of old codgers.
Surely not
(thinks)Hmm! Pentaxes? is that a proper word??
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Whitby Goth Weekend, Saturday 5 November 2011 at 03/10/2011 - 16:46
davidtrout wrote:
David
I've been to Whitby, I think he was right in the first placeQuote:
people who were buried there still have ancestors in the town.
I think they mean descendantspeople who were buried there still have ancestors in the town.
David
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Whitby Goth Weekend, Saturday 5 November 2011 at 03/10/2011 - 09:21
When you upgrade as I did from PS7 to CS2, one of the stipulations is that I had to have PS7, or similar, on my PC, (purely because it is an upgrade), and I have to keep it there in order to use CS2, regardless of whether I use PS7 or not. If I deleted PS7 then I would imagine that my use of CS2 would end as well??
If it is a replacement then you should be free of that sort of obligation.
If it is a replacement then you should be free of that sort of obligation.
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Photoshop upgrade (PS7 to CS4) at 30/09/2011 - 16:41
[IMG]http://i1091.photobucket.com/albums/i400/EdLeeWWA2714/Eagle12/Flower1.jpg[/IMG]
Yeh photobucket works OK
Yeh photobucket works OK
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Linking Images Into Posts at 30/09/2011 - 16:07
I have two cats. Do you think total body armour would help?
I might also have a psychiatrist standing by. (not for the cat, for me --ow)
I might also have a psychiatrist standing by. (not for the cat, for me --ow)
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Another pointless thread at 30/09/2011 - 11:51
That does sound like a good option. But I did say in my original post that I was thinking of upgrading in the near future, but not this near.
Thanks for the offer Giorgio.
Thanks for the offer Giorgio.
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Upgrade from istDL at 29/09/2011 - 21:11
johnriley wrote:
I have no problem with replacing the sky, but I do think the image is somewhat spoilt by the inconsistent lighting. The sky shows dramatic, bright lighting, but the foreground is dull unlit and bland.
When two images are combined, it's very useful for the lighting conditions on all parts of the image to be the same. Without this, we won't be convinced that the sky is really part of this scene.
Hope that doesn't seem harsh and that it helps.
I agree, try making it B&W and burn the sky in.I have no problem with replacing the sky, but I do think the image is somewhat spoilt by the inconsistent lighting. The sky shows dramatic, bright lighting, but the foreground is dull unlit and bland.
When two images are combined, it's very useful for the lighting conditions on all parts of the image to be the same. Without this, we won't be convinced that the sky is really part of this scene.
Hope that doesn't seem harsh and that it helps.
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Cheating? at 29/09/2011 - 16:37
grandadchris6 wrote:
Reminds me of my old Dad..he always wore his flat cap at a angle.. also very simular in looks as well..He's been gone 10 years ...
It also reminds me of my dad when he was happy. Reminds me of my old Dad..he always wore his flat cap at a angle.. also very simular in looks as well..He's been gone 10 years ...
Comment by Eagle12 posted on Quite Chuffed at 29/09/2011 - 15:48
Did you backlight it, or is that just the result of the dodging?