Don

Joined: 12th November 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Don
Gwyn wrote:
Mike-P wrote:

Didn't you get an early adopters price from SRS anyway?
It was a little bit less than the advertised price.
But others will have bought from SRS and other shops at a higher price and won't get the cash back. It doesn't seem fair for them.
I never understood consumers that line up and even sleep in line just to be first for the new item.
I do understand the desire to get a new item that you want or need.
It is hard to be patient, but being first to buy also means being first to find the first run production errors.... first to find bugs and gllitches..... and first to find out if the initial asking price is off base compared to the market.

Sad but true, you pay extra to be the beta tester on all fronts.

It is easier to lower the price of a product after it hits the market, than to release it at one price, then realize you could've charged more... seldom does a product get so much demand that a manufacturer might be tempted to raise prices after launch, and when it does happen, the public usually cries "foul" and "Price gouging".

Comment by Don posted on Pentax cashback at 31/10/2010 - 02:11

Don
looks to me like you got it covered unless you want to swap out that tamron 90 for the pentax 100 macro....
all I got is the 50 1.4, 100 macro and 16-45......
oh yeah, I get results...
Comment Image


oh yeah, I got the 28-70 f4 and 85 2.2 soft as well...

Comment by Don posted on Portrait lens consideration. at 28/10/2010 - 20:51

Don
MattMatic wrote:
Thanks Don
From what I've read the new DAL35 is the same basic optical formula, just with some of the extra glass shaved off (to cover the APS-C area). There will be less CA, it's true, since the coatings have improved.

But, alas, it's a plastic mount.

Looks like I might end up keeping the DA35/2 at this rate, or selling it for a song later to fund a K5

Matt
with the exchange rate and shipping costs this would not work for me, here in Canada, but I hope somebody local to you jumps at the lens!
You can trust Matt, people!

Somebody dropped me an email:

"Don

.....If you are really looking for a 35mm lens then why not just buy Matt’s 35/f2. I have this lens and it is excellent, it’s the lens I pick by default and as far as I can see it has no known faults, it just delivers good, strong images with Pentax colours at very modest cost. AF is excellent but no quick shift which I do accept is a PITA."

to which I replied:

"hi there...
the only real thing preventing me from buying from Matt is this...
exchange rates, and shipping costs. it gets too close in price to the 35mm macro all said and done.
around here these lenses generally are in the $100.00 to $200.00 canadian when you can find them.... I've found a couple less than perfect copies out there.... but I want excellent, and cheap and I got till spring to buy something.
Mattmatic is soo good to people on the forum, I'd hate to insult him with a really lowball offer. He's asking a fair price, for where he is located..but too much for me, all other factors considered."

I meant to say the 21 ltd which is a lttle less than the 35 macro right now retail....
They are usually closer to what Matt is asking on ebay and in the bigger areas like Toronto... But Winnipeg.... you can often find somebody looking for a quick sale at half the going rate, if you are patient..... and cheap..... like me.....

Comment by Don posted on FS: Samsung-badged 35mm f/2 prime at 28/10/2010 - 19:47

Don
Cyrils Rocky Mountian Cousin says "Keep your hands off my ....."
Comment Image

Comment by Don posted on In defence of harmless creatures - set of 6 at 28/10/2010 - 18:38

Don
hefty1 wrote:
I miss Quickshift on my 43 and 77 lenses so I sympathise with your position. Still don't think I'll be in any rush to swap them for the DA equivalents just yet, although the DA35 Macro is easily in the same league optically imo (hence me never actually buying a FA31).
I'm considering the 35 macro as well. I want a decent prime in the 21 to 35 mm range, and the macro seems to be worth the money.... but Gerri likes to use af, and I worry that if she got the 35 macro on during a wedding shoot in low light the hunting for focus will be a problem for her... yet I know the 31 ltd price will definitely be a problem for her.....

See why sleeping with your boss can have adverse effects on your job?
I can't exactly fire her and hire somebody that has better eyesight and tell them to use manual focus....
I can't just go out and buy a 31 ltd and send in a reciept....
and I'm having no luck finding a decent used copy of a 28 or 35.....

my only hope is that the new 35 performs....

Comment by Don posted on Limited Conundrum... at 28/10/2010 - 15:32

Don
will read thnx.
on a related note, (complaints about camera manufacture) Ricehigh is whining about the red focus dots in the kr....
how many years was he nagging about the lack of red dots in the kx?

oh, and something about the battery as well...

I can't help but wonder...
How many people in this guys immediate family... spouse, children, parents etc have committed suicide from having to listen to this guys constant neurotic whining?

Comment by Don posted on Newer sensors worse results? (open letter) at 28/10/2010 - 10:31

Don
the only way to keep your photos from being taken on the net is to keep them off the net.

The older stuff on my website is crap compared to some of the stuff on my hard drives.

Comment by Don posted on Protecting your pictures online (Flickr etc) at 27/10/2010 - 22:39

Don
Hypocorism wrote:
Don wrote:

between digital 8, hdv, avchd on three Sony camcorders, three pentax d-slrs, peavy and bose soundboards... two macbooks, etc... on a big project, I got my hands full.... prefer everything on manual....
Epic!

.R.
That is me... epic.
Seriously..... you do this long enough, you can walk in to a room, a studio or location shoot, look at the set up and guess the exposure and camera settings you'll need.
manual means no surprises.
no surprises means no "We can fix this in post" famous last words fiascos.

Comment by Don posted on think of leaving Pentax every now and again at 27/10/2010 - 22:06

Don
Anvh wrote:
Ah okay thank you Don.

Probably the distance from the front element to subject with the 100 is twice as much as with the 35 so... you probably lose half the light compared to the 35?
there is that, also light loss from the fact that true macros effectively have the extension tubes built in and lose some additional light at close focus..... so the 100 would would in fact need more power than the 35... for both reasons.

Comment by Don posted on TTL on a K5 at 27/10/2010 - 21:50

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo