All Forum Comments
Comment by davidwozhere posted on SMC Pentax Reflex Zoom 1:8~12 400~600mm - good bad or indifferent? at 25/02/2022 - 01:32
The answer was so simple - and in keeping with all mirror lenses - you really have to NAIL the focus. The tiniest bit out will cost way more than it would with a conventional lens. So stick it on a tripod, use magnified live view (and be thankful for the K1's flippy screen!).

It's a fairly large beast that comes with a robust metal hood (don't buy a mirror lens without its hood. You will regret it). The zoom ring is towards the rear and is exactly the right tightness to resist sliding by itself but retaining a nice smooth action. The focusing ring is huge and has next to no play in it at all. You move it a micrometer and it has an effect - hence the need for accuracy. At the camera end there is a screw-in filter that is an integral part of the design. The resident filter is marked "normal" but you can replace it with a skylight, red or yellow, or with one of the ND filters - 2x, 2.8x or 4x, all of which live in a special compartment inside the lid of the case. These are 40.5mm diameter, built like tanks and they also fit my Meyer 50mm Primotar perfectly !

This catkin image is quite nice but it isn't quite right. It isn't camera shake (1/1000sec ISO 1600) and if you enlarge it it will be seen to be a tiny focus problem.

Mrs. pigeon, on the other hand, was right at the top of an alder tree but properly focused she has produced a lovely image at 600mm.

One from last summer, the tripod legs were splayed wide and the camera was almost on the ground. Again at 600mm it's hard to complain about this one!

And from last spring, a breaking sycamore bud.

But 'where is that doughnut bokeh', you might be asking? Oh, it can do that in spades, especially with holly and laurel in the background.

Several of the above are fairly close to the camera. This one is a tiny target way up on the TV ariel.

And finally, an even tinier target hovering over an echinops bloom, this one at 500mm.

I'm pleased that I did persevere with this as it has turned out to be quite versatile performer.
Comment by davidwozhere posted on SMC Pentax Reflex Zoom 1:8~12 400~600mm - good bad or indifferent? at 21/02/2022 - 19:10
There is no apparent wear on the chromed bits and no-one has done the necessary damage to the blackened side so I can only assume these are mint and unused? I have two sets of these and I find them exceptionally useful - but you do need to scrape off a bit of the anodizing next to each of the leftmost pins (as seen above) otherwise the electrical circuit cannot complete and they won't work.
Comment by davidwozhere posted on FS: Jessops PKA/AF Auto Extension tube set at 21/02/2022 - 17:41
Comment by davidwozhere posted on North Tyneside at 21/02/2022 - 00:09
Comment by davidwozhere posted on Looking forward to the Summer..... at 17/02/2022 - 22:54
Comment by davidwozhere posted on Tit at 17/02/2022 - 00:27
Comment by davidwozhere posted on FS: Pancolar Electric 1.8/50 MC by Carl Zeiss Jena DDR at 17/02/2022 - 00:21
Comment by davidwozhere posted on Image Synch won’t connect at 16/02/2022 - 01:04
Comment by davidwozhere posted on Help! SMC Pentax-A 400mm f/5.6 showing signs of fungus at 15/02/2022 - 01:25
Comment by davidwozhere posted on Another outing for a heritage lens at 15/02/2022 - 00:58

