All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on *ist DL, any opnions--I may be purchasing an ist-DL w/lens at 25/11/2006 - 19:36
I might suggest you have a look through the list, see what low trigger voltage ones you could get cheap (or if you have one already, what it's trigger voltage is), and go from there. I guess there's no harm in going for a low voltage one, and potentially some harm from the higher ones. As I say, there's never been a problem with my Centon, but then there's nothing to say the flash circuits in the DL are rated the same as the D.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Slave Flash Trouble: Turning off Pre-flash at 25/11/2006 - 19:08
If I could just put a cheap flash on the hotshoe to trigger the slaves then the problem would be solved.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Slave Flash Trouble: Turning off Pre-flash at 24/11/2006 - 17:38
There's a poor copy here:
[url]http://www.instruccionesweb.com/u2/pdf/flash/Pentax-AF400FTZ-en.pdf[url]
Someone else may know a better one, but at least it's something to be getting on with.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on AF400FTZ at 23/11/2006 - 21:26
Got one of these myself, and it gives good support, but did need about 2.5kg of dried beans to fill it sufficiently. But if you go for a lighter filling, it won't be as solid. Bit of a lump to carry round, I tend to use it if I'm shooting from the car, or a hide (the shed type you get at reserves).
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Ultra Tele lens at 24/11/2006 - 16:27
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Ultra Tele lens at 24/11/2006 - 10:17
But I read it as "It'll be released as an 18Mp camera, and we'll carry on upgrading (updating) the model, until it reaches a maximum of 30Mp." I don't think you'll be able to increase the resolution of the chip in the camera you have, but you will be able to get a higher res, but otherwise same, basic camera.
Course, I could be wrong. Didn't Kodak have an 'upgradable' sensor in their DSLR? The problem is, when you upgrade the sensor, everything thing else needs upgrading to cope with the increased processing, storage etc.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on The new 645NII medium format bodied digital... at 23/11/2006 - 17:53
I reckon you're right - this is the best place for all things Pentax! And we're more than happy to see what you produce with your gear.
All the best,
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Hi there at 20/11/2006 - 15:34
10-20 Sigma
16-45 Pentax
50 1.7 Pentax
50-200 Pentax
105mm Macro Sigma
I've only had the 50-200 for a week and haven't had much chance to use it, but initial results are good, and I got it based on the good reviews and high regard found here on the board. Nice and compact too.
I bought the 10-20 after doing some architecture shots where I was struggling to get a wide enough view using the 16-45, and I couldn't justify the higher cost of the Pentax 12-24. I felt that range overlapped the 16-45 too much as well, the Sigma giving me just that little extra. Nice solid build, good results from that too, although I don't use it that often. Can use Cokin P filters with it as well - the holder will actually sit on the front of the lens, where the lens hood normally bayonets on, sort of hangs on to it. Fine if the camera's on a tripod, obviously not hand-held.
The 16-45 is the lens that spends most of the time on the camera. I got it to replace the 18-35 that came with my D. I was used to the the angle of view of a 24mm lens on film, and the 16-45 gives me that.
Think I've got my lenses sorted - now, do I go for the K10D?
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on getting ready to buy some new glass at 20/11/2006 - 23:41
You'll also need to enable the camera to use lenses that don't have an 'A' setting - you do this in the camera menu somewhere.
If your 'ist' is a film ist, someone else will have to answer you, as I don't have any experience of that body.
Hope that helps,
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on 50/1.7 lens at 18/11/2006 - 22:31


Dan