All Forum Comments
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Astromological piccy at 06/12/2006 - 23:37
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Astromological piccy at 05/12/2006 - 18:08
I've had some success using a beanbag for support, just resting on the window sill (with window open, obviously ). The shot below was with my Tamron 300mm f/2.8 + 2x convertor. Cropped down, and reduced 50%. Shutter speed was 1/45s, so guessing the aperture was f/16 (this was before I got the KA mount for the lens).

The not-quite-fullness of the moon allows some more detail to be shown in the craters I think. It's surprising how often you have to recompose when shooting the moon - it's moves a lot quicker than you realise.
Hope you have a productive time in the woods tomorrow (did type 'good time' but thought I'd better change it ).
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Astromological piccy at 03/12/2006 - 20:33
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Reciprocity Failure ? at 03/12/2006 - 21:21
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Reciprocity Failure ? at 03/12/2006 - 18:45
A quick browse through the web seems to suggest that RF doesn't apply to digital, but long exposures do increase noise, which you obviously don't get with film. The D seems to handle this okay though, when noise reduction is switched off.
I did some 1 minute exposures a while back, as well as 4 and 16 seconds, and didn't notice any great variations in exposure.
Best thing though is just to try it out!
And don't forget to wrap up warm.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on Reciprocity Failure ? at 02/12/2006 - 23:22
Sorry, it was only Gwyn who actually commented. To be honest it's not really my cup of tea, but you've executed it well, and it's got a nice feel to it. The blend of the elements is just right, and not something I would have thought of doing.
Had I been in a church, with free rein to do as I please, I (and I suspect quite a few others) would have been looking at the ceiling, stonework or pews, so full marks to you for coming up with something different.
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Image at 02/12/2006 - 18:59
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Image at 02/12/2006 - 14:11
They've obviously got some kind of nifty software to stop people pinching the pics (or at least embedding them straight in a page via a link), but that's not much use to John!
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on New Image at 02/12/2006 - 14:01
Dan
Comment by Daniel Bridge posted on User defined print sizes? at 03/12/2006 - 20:01





I think it's a tad more pleasing than the original.
And the sharpest effort so far, I reckon.
Dan